England needs to seal its pipe about excessive damage to BP

[LTC8K6]

BP is a publicly traded company. Its not owned by 'the Brits'.

AFAIK The US public owns slightly more BP shares than the UK public, and BP employs more people in the US than in the UK.

So its fine and understandable to be pissed at BP, but don't try and turn this into a UK thing.

Yes, the BP bashing and shakedown is hurting a lot of Americans.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/06/026550.php

 

[Infohawk]

I cannot tell if canoworms is being serious or not and that scares me.

It scares me you can't tell. He's obviously serious.

 

[Infohawk]

You advocate supremacy. It seems simple to me. If you advocate supremacy than you're a supremacist. You hate egalitarianism, multiculturalism, etc. You support mass deportations, eradications, etc. You have a fetish for genocide.



It's not that complicated. Blow it up at 2 am, give a warning, etc.



He hates the UK. They tortured his grandfather. They smashed his testicles with metal rods. I wouldn't be surprised if he would do more than what I advocate if it were not for domestic political realities.



How is it any different than talking about military strikes against any other country (Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, Mexico, etc.)? Oh yeah, it destroys your dream of a race-based paradise.

Sorry, there is not a lack of white population growth (but you do seem extremely insecure on the issue and seem obsessed with it leading you to talk about all your race war BS that I assume you picked up from some Idaho white supremacist fort). There is a lack of European population growth; many of the remedies include allowing immigration of whites too (just those you deem to be inferior such as Eastern Europeans, Turks, Arabs, etc.). Your consistent confusion moves you squarely into whack-job territory. That coupled with your incessant talk about Jews and Muslims and other minorities suggests you have a problem with those groups. But please, feel free to deny that. And at the same time you could explain your obsession with minorities and race-related posts.

Everything has to do with race with you. I'm just obsessed with European politics the same way many here are obsessed with American politics, Israel, Islam, nuclear proliferation, etc. You're just plain obsessed with race and the mixing of races and all sorts of race-related concepts.

I don't advocate supremacy. I like how you keep watering down your bogus allegations though. I'm not a fan of multiculturalism, but culture is not the same thing as race. I don't support mass deportations or genocide. I don't have a problem with race-mixing. I think most of the world will ultimately look like Brazil at some point. But I don't think white people should be consistently punished like you do.

You couldn't be more delusional about Obama's views on Britain. Obama wants the special relationship to be stronger. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7918345.stm
Obama has made it clear he's not targeting the Brits over BP. http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20100613/NEWS18/6130330/Obama-to-Britain-No-hard-feelings Even though this has triggered backlash from foxnews and the like. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/12/obama-britains-cameron-talk-oil-spill/

I post about a variety of topics on P&N. You even admit this in your own dumbass post. You on the other hand only post about Europe and race.

The only thing good thing about your posts in this thread is that it shows how insane you really are and that you concede you advocate for terrorist acts. Again, I have come out and 100% denied your allegations of racism. You are on record as targeting civilian targets in the middle of a large city. (The whole 2 am thing is just ridiculous in that it compromises the theoretical mission and doesn't really change the fact you are attacking civilian targets.
And you hatred for Londoners is really just sad because you don't seem to realize that London is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. )

 

[PingSpike]

I'm not sure why England is all worked anyway. Its just a bunch of hot air to placate the masses, as usual. Maybe a few execs will be forced to deploy golden parachutes a bit early but I don't really expect much will happen in the end.

I mean, when all your large companies have purchased both political parties and are run by sociopaths that don't have to personally absorb any of their own failures (but do profit greatly from their risky successes) only an idiot would expect anything different!

At this point I think nothing less then the outlawing of lobby groups with the punishment being beheading would have any effect. And even then, a patsy would probably end up falling under most of the axes. Besides, who's going to pass that kind of law!? Heehaw!

 

[Sclamoz]

BP is a publicly traded company. Its not owned by 'the Brits'.

AFAIK The US public owns slightly more BP shares than the UK public, and BP employs more people in the US than in the UK.

So its fine and understandable to be pissed at BP, but don't try and turn this into a UK thing.

The reason it's getting turned into a British thing is because the British media and you're politicians are interjected themselves into the situation. Before they opened their mouths no one was thinking about Britain at all.

 

[CanOWorms]

I don't advocate supremacy. I like how you keep watering down your bogus allegations though. I'm not a fan of multiculturalism, but culture is not the same thing as race. I don't support mass deportations or genocide. I don't have a problem with race-mixing. I think most of the world will ultimately look like Brazil at some point. But I don't think white people should be consistently punished like you do.

I have never suggested such a thing. However, you have advocated punishment of minority groups. You advocate stopping immigration, denying rights, etc. You support race/ethnic/religious-based punishment.

You couldn't be more delusional about Obama's views on Britain. Obama wants the special relationship to be stronger. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7918345.stm
Obama has made it clear he's not targeting the Brits over BP. http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20100613/NEWS18/6130330/Obama-to-Britain-No-hard-feelings Even though this has triggered backlash from foxnews and the like. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/12/obama-britains-cameron-talk-oil-spill/

That is just spin to satisfy some voters. He has been consistently snubbing the UK and other European countries.

I post about a variety of topics on P&N. You even admit this in your own dumbass post. You on the other hand only post about Europe and race.

No, I don't. I post on many topics. And I create less threads than you. Sometimes I notice 3 or 4 threads regarding Muslims or Jews by you created within days of each other!

The only thing good thing about your posts in this thread is that it shows how insane you really are and that you concede you advocate for terrorist acts. Again, I have come out and 100% denied your allegations of racism. You are on record as targeting civilian targets in the middle of a large city. (The whole 2 am thing is just ridiculous in that it compromises the theoretical mission and doesn't really change the fact you are attacking civilian targets.
And you hatred for Londoners is really just sad because you don't seem to realize that London is one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world. )

I don't understand how you can deny it when you dream about a racially pure land for yourself.

 

[0roo0roo]

I'm not sure why England is all worked anyway. Its just a bunch of hot air to placate the masses, as usual. Maybe a few execs will be forced to deploy golden parachutes a bit early but I don't really expect much will happen in the end.

pent up anti americanism i guess. they had it easy throwing out the bash with bush. now they are all constipated with anti american bs they just needed a vague reason for grievance.

it is rather disturbing to watch how their media outlets take everything as a slight, calling it british instead of bp was enough to set them off i guess. So much for the supposed superior cultural sophistication/worldly understanding of other cultures by the brits

 

[Infohawk]

I have never suggested such a thing. However, you have advocated punishment of minority groups. You advocate stopping immigration, denying rights, etc. You support race/ethnic/religious-based punishment.

That is just spin to satisfy some voters. He has been consistently snubbing the UK and other European countries.

No, I don't. I post on many topics. And I create less threads than you. Sometimes I notice 3 or 4 threads regarding Muslims or Jews by you created within days of each other!

I don't understand how you can deny it when you dream about a racially pure land for yourself.

Advocating limits on immigration doesn't make someone racist. Are you smart enough to realize that? I don't support racial or ethnic-based punishment. I don't have a problem with religious based sanctions because religion is a choice. Again, this is different than racism.

You might as well put on the tinfoil hat now. Obama has not been snubbing European countries. Sounds like you idolize him and create fantasies in which he shares the same views as you. Contrary to what right-wingers say or what wack-jobs like you think, Obama is relatively moderate.

I don't dream about a racially pure land for myself. I've made that pretty clear but you are so dishonest you refuse to recognize that. Please go ahead and deny that you'd love to see a world wide war on European countries and white people generally.

 

[CanOWorms]

Advocating limits on immigration doesn't make someone racist. Are you smart enough to realize that? I don't support racial or ethnic-based punishment. I don't have a problem with religious based sanctions because religion is a choice. Again, this is different than racism.

You're just hiding behind religion (which is bigoted enough) as a driver for your racism. Your advocating limits on immigration because of racial, ethnic, or religious characteristics is racist.

You might as well put on the tinfoil hat now. Obama has not been snubbing European countries. Sounds like you idolize him and create fantasies in which he shares the same views as you. Contrary to what right-wingers say or what wack-jobs like you think, Obama is relatively moderate.

Yes, he has. He snubbed Spain when it held the EU presidency. He has snubbed the UK repeatedly.

I don't dream about a racially pure land for myself. I've made that pretty clear but you are so dishonest you refuse to recognize that. Please go ahead and deny that you'd love to see a world wide war on European countries and white people generally.

You're the one prepping and wishing (and demanding) for a race war. Apparently you spent some time in a white supremacist fort in Idaho. I wonder if there's a video on YouTube of you running around an obstacle course in fatigues.

 

[Infohawk]

You're just hiding behind religion (which is bigoted enough) as a driver for your racism. Your advocating limits on immigration because of racial, ethnic, or religious characteristics is racist.



Yes, he has. He snubbed Spain when it held the EU presidency. He has snubbed the UK repeatedly.



You're the one prepping and wishing (and demanding) for a race war. Apparently you spent some time in a white supremacist fort in Idaho. I wonder if there's a video on YouTube of you running around an obstacle course in fatigues.

You really are stubborn in your lies aren't you? I don't advocate racial or ethnic limits on immigration. And there's nothing racial about religion. None of the major religions is limited to a race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Barack_Obama_foreign_trips.svg Notice a pattern moron? Obama has visited Europe a lot.

And once again: I will deny your allegations. I'm not preparing for a race war. I don't even think one is going to happen. But you won't deny mine. Is that because you really do want a world war on Europe and white people? Why not deny it?

 

[CanOWorms]

You really are stubborn in your lies aren't you? I don't advocate racial or ethnic limits on immigration. And there's nothing racial about religion. None of the major religions is limited to a race.

Of course. But you hide behind that to advance your racist ideas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Barack_Obama_foreign_trips.svg Notice a pattern moron? Obama has visited Europe a lot.

I fail to see how it helps.

And once again: I will deny your allegations. I'm not preparing for a race war. I don't even think one is going to happen. But you won't deny mine. Is that because you really do want a world war on Europe and white people? Why not deny it?

You have interesting logic. I see that you haven't denied my statements on you likely being trained at a white supremacist fort in Idaho.

You're the one always bringing up race wars. It appears to be some fetish of yours (likely picked up during your training in Idaho). I've never mentioned anything like that before. It's obvious that I deny it.

 

[Infohawk]

Of course. But you hide behind that to advance your racist ideas.



I fail to see how it helps.



You have interesting logic. I see that you haven't denied my statements on you likely being trained at a white supremacist fort in Idaho.

You're the one always bringing up race wars. It appears to be some fetish of yours (likely picked up during your training in Idaho). I've never mentioned anything like that before. It's obvious that I deny it.

Do you see how all your arguments are based on things for which there is no proof? Like your claim that I'm hiding that I'm a racist or that Obama secretly hates Europeans too. (Never mind that Obama himself is of European descent. What a jackass you are.) I only bring up race wars when referencing your ideas. That's like saying the Anti-Defamation League is anti-semitic because they are always talking about anti-semitism.

I haven't ever done anything to suggest that I was at a white supremacist fort in Idaho. And I have never been at one. You know that but you are too intellectually dishonest to admit it. Your anti-Europe agenda is blatant and extreme. (People have even picked up on it in this thread.) So it's reasonable to ask, do want there to be a war against Europe and white people?

 

[CanOWorms]

Do you see how all your arguments are based on things for which there is no proof? Like your claim that I'm hiding that I'm a racist or that Obama secretly hates Europeans too. (Never mind that Obama himself is of European descent. What a jackass you are.) I only bring up race wars when referencing your ideas. That's like saying the Anti-Defamation League is anti-semitic because they are always talking about anti-semitism.

I'm pretty sure you're one of the those people who would claim that Martin Luther King Jr. or the Anti-Defamation League are racists. You seem very threatened by minorities advocating against racist and discriminatory policies.

I haven't ever done anything to suggest that I was at a white supremacist fort in Idaho. And I have never been at one. You know that but you are too intellectually dishonest to admit it. Your anti-Europe agenda is blatant and extreme. (People have even picked up on it in this thread.) So it's reasonable to ask, do want there to be a war against Europe and white people?

There you go again with the race war and the Europe = white homeland stuff. I wonder what they did to you at that Idaho fort.

 

[StageLeft]

I'm not sure why England is all worked anyway. Its just a bunch of hot air to placate the masses, as usual.

That's what i think, too.

OK, for fun, let's say Obama put on the news that tonight at 2 am GMT the big ben clock tower is going to be flattened by a cruise missile so make sure you're not near it.

How would England react exactly, canoworms?

 

[WhipperSnapper]

If Slovenia beats or ties England and the U.S. beats Algeria, perhaps the anger on that isle will be directed towards their soccer team and butterfingered goalie.

 

[spittledip]

Actually the cause of both is pretty similar. Liberal environmentalists blocked the construction of an oil pipeline from Alaska to the states, which is why the Exxon had to transport the oil by ship instead, which lead to the oil spill.

Similarly, liberal environmentalists blocking oil exploration in Alaska, the lower 48, and in shallow waters caused BP to search for oil in deep water, where it is extremely difficult to stop and cleanup this current spill.

Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. Environmentalists are directly responsible for the destruction of our environment.

No one should be allowed to drill for oil in any body of water. It is ridiculously perilous. How some people don't care about this is very strange. It is almost like they don't understand the effect that something like this will have on the "precious" economy, even if they don't care about the environment.

 

[Infohawk]

I'm pretty sure you're one of the those people who would claim that Martin Luther King Jr. or the Anti-Defamation League are racists. You seem very threatened by minorities advocating against racist and discriminatory policies.



There you go again with the race war and the Europe = white homeland stuff. I wonder what they did to you at that Idaho fort.

Uhh wrong again about MLK or Anti-Defamation League. Anyway, you've shown your true colors in this thread. In the past you've limited your comments to saying that Europeans are motivated by genocide and now you are advocating military strikes on civilian targets. And it's fairly pathetic that all you can come up with is copying what people have said about you. Remember that poster who asked you where the Europeans touched you? He owned you nicely and now you're just trying to mimic him. Obviously you got beat up in Europe or something. Get over it. You shouldn't hold that against all white people.

 

[CanOWorms]

That's what i think, too.

OK, for fun, let's say Obama put on the news that tonight at 2 am GMT the big ben clock tower is going to be flattened by a cruise missile so make sure you're not near it.

How would England react exactly, canoworms?

One would hope they would keep their people away, but then again they are legally classified as peasants and viewed as disposable humans by the royalty class.

 

[theeedude]

BP is a publicly traded company. Its not owned by 'the Brits'.

AFAIK The US public owns slightly more BP shares than the UK public, and BP employs more people in the US than in the UK.

So its fine and understandable to be pissed at BP, but don't try and turn this into a UK thing.

No pity for other BP shareholders either. But we've been told that we shouldn't make BP pay because it's bad for British pensioners, and they should be treated just like other BP shareholders, have their equity and dividends wiped out.

 

[CanOWorms]

Uhh wrong again about MLK or Anti-Defamation League. Anyway, you've shown your true colors in this thread. In the past you've limited your comments to saying that Europeans are motivated by genocide and now you are advocating military strikes on civilian targets. And it's fairly pathetic that all you can come up with is copying what people have said about you. Remember that poster who asked you where the Europeans touched you? He owned you nicely and now you're just trying to mimic him. Obviously you got beat up in Europe or something. Get over it. You shouldn't hold that against all white people.

There you go again with the race stuff! It never ends with you. Everything is about race somehow even when it doesn't make sense, you narrowly limit your definition of white people to a small fraction of the demographic, criticism of a government is criticism of a race (even though they have many people involved), etc. Why don't you apply your "POLL: Are You Anti-Semitic if you Disagree with Israel?" thread doctrine to other situations?

As you spend more time outside that secluded Idaho fort perhaps you will broaden your horizons.