Why is the opinion of nobel winning economists relevant to topics other than economics?
Yet that's not what the paper says or is about. Again, I don't necesarrily disagree with the premise, but having people with economics nobel prizes sign off on it doesn't add any value or credibility, and doesn't make it any better.
Actually, you can get a nobel just for being popular, our idiot in chief demonstrated that.
a statement that is assumed to be true for the purpose of an argument from which a conclusion is drawn.
The non-whites really aren't in there for drugs though. It's violence.
No.
"According to the Sentencing Project, African-Americans make up 12% of the nations drug users, but represent 34% of those arrested for drug offenses, and 45% of those in state prison for such offense as of 2005."
http://www.msnbc.com/politicsnation/criminal-injustice-the-percentage-african
more recent figures:
"Blacks make up 50 percent of the state and local prisoners incarcerated for drug crimes. Black kids are 10 times more likely to be arrested for drug crimes than white ones -- even though white kids are more likely to abuse drugs."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/drug-war-mass-incarceration_n_3034310.html