MovingTarget
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2003
- 9,002
- 115
- 106
You don't understand what "two-way street" means. It means that both an employer and an employee must agree to work together. If you don't like the terms of your employment, you are not bound (unless by contract, in which case you knew what you were getting) to continue working there.
Clearly there isn't as much of a problem as the media continually paints, as people still work for these companies and people still take seasonal temp jobs with them and people still agree to work knowing full well that "retail" means that you work to serve others.
Again, if you don't like it, you ARE free to seek other employment. In that sense, the employee has the power. If you are valuable to a company, they will try to retain you. If you are not valuable to a company, then you will be replaced if you leave.
And, no, not every employee is valuable enough to a company to try to retain.
Yep, they are free to go seek other employment - at every other employer down the street that does the exact same thing. You are kidding yourself if you believe that there is any real free choice for these lower pay/skill workers. Saying that workers are the ones with real power in that situation, when that power is merely to choose between losing their income and losing the chance to spend time with their families is very much a "Let them eat cake" type of statement. Every employee has an inherit dignity regardless of whether a company considers them "valuable enough" to have any. We can demand better than this from our corporations when it comes to workers choosing between their livelihoods and family time.
