WEEEE!!! U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit FINALLY decided government's appeal in US v. Emerson.
The short of things: U.S. Court of Appeals AFFIRMED the Second Amendment unquestionably protects an individual right to keep and bear personal firearms, giving the smack-down to virtually every tired and worn-out lie parroted by the gun control movement, but nonetheless found that Timothy Emerson's 2nd Amendment rights were not violated by USC 922(g)(8).
"We agree with the district court that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to privately keep and bear their own firearms that are suitable as individual, personal weapons and are not of the general kind or type excluded by Miller, regardless of whether the particular individual is then actually a member of a militia.(66) However, for the reasons stated, we also conclude that the predicate order in question here is sufficient, albeit likely minimally so, to support the deprivation, while it remains in effect, of the defendant's Second Amendment rights. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's dismissal of the indictment on Second Amendment grounds."
The long of things: US v. Emerson decision
Big win for gun rights!! The gun-grabbers have received another HUGE smackdown, to compliment the dismissal of dozens of their frivolous lawsuits across the country.
The short of things: U.S. Court of Appeals AFFIRMED the Second Amendment unquestionably protects an individual right to keep and bear personal firearms, giving the smack-down to virtually every tired and worn-out lie parroted by the gun control movement, but nonetheless found that Timothy Emerson's 2nd Amendment rights were not violated by USC 922(g)(8).
"We agree with the district court that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to privately keep and bear their own firearms that are suitable as individual, personal weapons and are not of the general kind or type excluded by Miller, regardless of whether the particular individual is then actually a member of a militia.(66) However, for the reasons stated, we also conclude that the predicate order in question here is sufficient, albeit likely minimally so, to support the deprivation, while it remains in effect, of the defendant's Second Amendment rights. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's dismissal of the indictment on Second Amendment grounds."
The long of things: US v. Emerson decision
Big win for gun rights!! The gun-grabbers have received another HUGE smackdown, to compliment the dismissal of dozens of their frivolous lawsuits across the country.
