Do you want her to run as an independent so Romney can win?
I think it is a good idea. the GOP controls the House and the Supreme Court and enough legislatures. She is a lot like my late and great grandmother and Gerald R Ford in that she is very intelligent and isn't dominating like my mother. It's weird how the Jeffersonianism and ingenuity skipped a generation, but we can share it
Romney is a good provider and he was simply put in too many new environments this last time; that was why so many thought he autism. I have sensory issues too, as I was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome but I am not quite as adherent tradition.
I believe Warren will help Romney out as Sen Clinton is a domineering idiot who has never publicly apologized for the risk maximization she has carried out. For example, she made sure her husband kept troops in Somalia. And then she told Brazilians that high tax rates are better. And Clinton looks, sounds, and acts stupid. As much as me in fact.
I am sure I could fart fire and die as far as our friend Elizabeth Warren is concerned but she is the natural populist successor and the one who will protect us from debt, communism, fascism, and all that shit.
Craig234 is a good guy and he could be President but then he couldn't be because he is an ENFP; no ENFP will ever be President of the United States. That's part of why I wish the Executive State repealed (I believe I am an ENTP who surrendered too many liberties to his STJ mom)
Really, if Senator Clinton becomes President Clinton II then the world will end and the love of, by, and for America could die. But really the Declaration of Independence goes the farthest in preserving liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. In the future, Thomas Jefferson's proposals for Confederation could be used to end taxes in north america and then to set an example for the world. New ingenuity will have to be added to it; for example it will be the Articles of Confederation USA where the USA gets 4 votes and has 4 equal regions each with their own currency powers and recognition of the human right to create individual currencies. Canada then gets 4 votes two for Anglophones and two for Francophones. Mexico gets 4 vote, including puerto rico, guam, USVI and all them get one vote. Having Canada combine with the USA will reduce the Xenaphobia in the U.S. because Canadians' shit smells even better than Americans' so Americans can take Canadians farts when/if the Mexicans bother Americans. They won't bother me because they're good people. But not everyone sees that.
The biggest problem with the Constitution is its dictates on money and contracts; it is very proto-keynesian (hyper-nationalist) and it would likely be unConstitutional to get rid of the Fed or even to repeal legal tender due to the Contracts clause. And of course the Constitution is extra-legal and was ratified through aggression. It's quite mercantilist but at the least the bill of rights made the govt something that couldn't operate in complete secrecy; without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution would've been silent legislation and no one would've supported their rights against govt abuse.
Your opinion please?
I think it is a good idea. the GOP controls the House and the Supreme Court and enough legislatures. She is a lot like my late and great grandmother and Gerald R Ford in that she is very intelligent and isn't dominating like my mother. It's weird how the Jeffersonianism and ingenuity skipped a generation, but we can share it
Romney is a good provider and he was simply put in too many new environments this last time; that was why so many thought he autism. I have sensory issues too, as I was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome but I am not quite as adherent tradition.
I believe Warren will help Romney out as Sen Clinton is a domineering idiot who has never publicly apologized for the risk maximization she has carried out. For example, she made sure her husband kept troops in Somalia. And then she told Brazilians that high tax rates are better. And Clinton looks, sounds, and acts stupid. As much as me in fact.
I am sure I could fart fire and die as far as our friend Elizabeth Warren is concerned but she is the natural populist successor and the one who will protect us from debt, communism, fascism, and all that shit.
Craig234 is a good guy and he could be President but then he couldn't be because he is an ENFP; no ENFP will ever be President of the United States. That's part of why I wish the Executive State repealed (I believe I am an ENTP who surrendered too many liberties to his STJ mom)
Really, if Senator Clinton becomes President Clinton II then the world will end and the love of, by, and for America could die. But really the Declaration of Independence goes the farthest in preserving liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness. In the future, Thomas Jefferson's proposals for Confederation could be used to end taxes in north america and then to set an example for the world. New ingenuity will have to be added to it; for example it will be the Articles of Confederation USA where the USA gets 4 votes and has 4 equal regions each with their own currency powers and recognition of the human right to create individual currencies. Canada then gets 4 votes two for Anglophones and two for Francophones. Mexico gets 4 vote, including puerto rico, guam, USVI and all them get one vote. Having Canada combine with the USA will reduce the Xenaphobia in the U.S. because Canadians' shit smells even better than Americans' so Americans can take Canadians farts when/if the Mexicans bother Americans. They won't bother me because they're good people. But not everyone sees that.
The biggest problem with the Constitution is its dictates on money and contracts; it is very proto-keynesian (hyper-nationalist) and it would likely be unConstitutional to get rid of the Fed or even to repeal legal tender due to the Contracts clause. And of course the Constitution is extra-legal and was ratified through aggression. It's quite mercantilist but at the least the bill of rights made the govt something that couldn't operate in complete secrecy; without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution would've been silent legislation and no one would've supported their rights against govt abuse.
Your opinion please?
Last edited:
Facebook
Twitter