Originally posted by: kpb
I don't think that will ever be pratcial for a number of reasons.
As mentioned it's at very high voltage. It has to be to arch threw the air and be lightning. At that voltage level's it would be hard if not impossible to transmit and would be very unsafe. It is possible to convert it down to lower voltages just like the power grid converts up and down but even that is left with problems. It isn't at any controled voltage and current level so you'd never know how much conversion down is needed.
Also as mentioned it's very incosistant. It's a whole lot of power for a very short period of time and then nothing. Power demand how ever is over time. There's no easy or efficient way of storing that energy.
Storage is it - battery technology is lagging badly. There's just no good way (yet) to store a whole lot of energy in a small space, at least without some kind of combustion or nuclear reaction. And you'd need to do it quickly - a few megawatts in a fraction of a second. Lead acid, Lithium ion, nickel-metal hydride, take your pick. A lightning strike to a huge bank of them would give one result - a lot of vaporized material and a lot of useless hunks of various elements and compounds.
So if there was a cheap, spatially efficient way of storing electricity, lightning would be a good power source. However, by that time, I think we'll probably have weather control systems. And we'd have to have sophisticated methods of keeping those little power storage devices from discharging internally, or directly across the terminals. Just look at what happens when you short out a Ni-cad battery. Those things have a very high discharge rate - they'll heat up a decent size wire fast, or spot-weld it to their terminals. Now store several thousand watts in something that size. Discharge that much quickly, and you'll heat up like that wire.