- Aug 10, 2002
- 5,847
- 154
- 106
Pretty much says it all. How do you guys feel about multi wire branch circuits? After some consideration, I decided not use them because of the following concerns:
If the neutral in an mwbc is opened, the resulting loads connected will see a spike in voltage. The two 2 120 volt circuits will change to a single 240 volt and will usually burn out an appliance. A neutral working itself loose or someone accidentally disconnecting it could result in a fire. Also you need to pigtail the neutral, since that pesky neutral can't be disconnected.
Secondly, failure to terminate the circuits to different phases in the panel will over load the neutral. Or overloading one leg will lead to an unbalanced condition; something I could see happening with receptacles. The average home owner just plugs stuff in with no understanding of a mwbc. It's arguable that heavier guage wire could be installed where even in an unbalanced condition, the wire could safely carry the extra current
The pros of mwbc? I understand the reasoning for it. Pulling 1 run of 12/3 is cheaper than 2 runs of 12/2. It might be easier to snake 1 cable vs 2, important consideration for old work. And one less conductor in the box could help to easier meet box fill requirements.
How does mwbc handle gfci/afci breakers? Are two pole breakers available like this? Is the resultant wiring compatible with afci/grci?
Regardless of the benefits, I think the cons outweigh and I try not to use them. I think the wiring, should it be disconnected, is fail-deadly vs a normal circuit where a loose wire fails safely. The connected loads and which leg they reside on are important in a mwbc. All for the reasoning of saving one cable run? Am I missing anything or are there any proponents of mwbc here? Is there a situation where an mwbc is the only solution?
If the neutral in an mwbc is opened, the resulting loads connected will see a spike in voltage. The two 2 120 volt circuits will change to a single 240 volt and will usually burn out an appliance. A neutral working itself loose or someone accidentally disconnecting it could result in a fire. Also you need to pigtail the neutral, since that pesky neutral can't be disconnected.
Secondly, failure to terminate the circuits to different phases in the panel will over load the neutral. Or overloading one leg will lead to an unbalanced condition; something I could see happening with receptacles. The average home owner just plugs stuff in with no understanding of a mwbc. It's arguable that heavier guage wire could be installed where even in an unbalanced condition, the wire could safely carry the extra current
The pros of mwbc? I understand the reasoning for it. Pulling 1 run of 12/3 is cheaper than 2 runs of 12/2. It might be easier to snake 1 cable vs 2, important consideration for old work. And one less conductor in the box could help to easier meet box fill requirements.
How does mwbc handle gfci/afci breakers? Are two pole breakers available like this? Is the resultant wiring compatible with afci/grci?
Regardless of the benefits, I think the cons outweigh and I try not to use them. I think the wiring, should it be disconnected, is fail-deadly vs a normal circuit where a loose wire fails safely. The connected loads and which leg they reside on are important in a mwbc. All for the reasoning of saving one cable run? Am I missing anything or are there any proponents of mwbc here? Is there a situation where an mwbc is the only solution?