- Aug 10, 2002
- 5,847
- 154
- 106
Reading a bit about AC current (have some rewiring projects at hand) and the way the hot and neutral wires are explained to me is the hot wire carries electricity under pressure (Volts) and amperes is a measure of how much current moving through the wire.
After passing through an electrical load (like a lightbulb) for instance, the electrical current is under zero pressure having given up its volts. Therefore the neutral return wire carries back the charge under zero voltage but there are still amps flowing.
If units of electrical power are measured in watts and watts = volts x amps, then a current flow of zero volts of going to equal zero units (watts) of electrical power, no matter how many amps? Correct? Therefore the neutral is a safe wire to touch in comparison to the hot wire which is fully energized.
Make any sense? I know there is a hole in my theory and likely to kill/injure me so I wont test it recklessly. What am I missing?
After passing through an electrical load (like a lightbulb) for instance, the electrical current is under zero pressure having given up its volts. Therefore the neutral return wire carries back the charge under zero voltage but there are still amps flowing.
If units of electrical power are measured in watts and watts = volts x amps, then a current flow of zero volts of going to equal zero units (watts) of electrical power, no matter how many amps? Correct? Therefore the neutral is a safe wire to touch in comparison to the hot wire which is fully energized.
Make any sense? I know there is a hole in my theory and likely to kill/injure me so I wont test it recklessly. What am I missing?