ElBaradei: World may be headed for nuclear destruction

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
What is the number one deterrant against an invasion? nuclear weapons
Iran, Iraq, and North Korea labelled as axis of evil, Bush invades one. The others jump to the number one deterrant. Cause and causality.
And who wants to use nukes in a battle scanerio while wanting to stop everyone else from having "the bomb"?

The world is heading into a dangerous direction thats for sure.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?


and where did he said in the article that Iraq had nuclear weapons???


 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?


and where did he said in the article that Iraq had nuclear weapons???

It didn't. What's your point?

 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

I think your house is a fire hazard, therefore to prevent a fire, lets have someone burn it down. People are concerned about this issue, however that does not mean that not going to war is appeasment, nor that war is a fix. We need someone who has a third mode, one which is not off, or blow everything to hell in a snit. Bush ain't it.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?


and where did he said in the article that Iraq had nuclear weapons???

It didn't. What's your point?

if you don't get it read your own statement

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?

basically, you are implying that El Baradeid lied when he made statements that Iraq had no nuclear weapons







 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?


and where did he said in the article that Iraq had nuclear weapons???

It didn't. What's your point?

if you don't get it read your own statement

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?

Sorry forgot who I was talking to. The point is that many of the same people who last year were ignoring El Baradei's reports about Iraq will now be pointing to this article and saying "see it's working". My question to them is, "Which El Baradei do you believe?" or ,"Why is his opinion now so valid?"

Can you hear me now?

Good.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Gee Bush was right!

Tell me again how wrong it was when Bush declared there was an "Axis of Evil" (Liberals Gasped when he made the comment)
Tell me again how it was not Bush's leadership that resulted in Libya dismantleing it's nuclear weapons program..
Tell me again how the Liberals would handle this better with hand-wringing and appeasement...

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?


and where did he said in the article that Iraq had nuclear weapons???

It didn't. What's your point?

if you don't get it read your own statement

So which el Baradei is to be believed. The one in this article or the one who, last year, told us Iraq didn't have a nucular weapons program?

Sorry forgot who I was talking to. The point is that many of the same people who last year were ignoring El Baradei's reports about Iraq will now be pointing to this article and saying "see it's working". My question to them is, "Which El Baradei do you believe?" or ,"Why is his opinion now so valid?"

Can you hear me now?

Good.

Are you talking about this report? the El Baradei report before the security council

link


the IAEA concluded, by December 1998, that it had neutralized Iraq's past nuclear programme and that, therefore, there were no unresolved disarmament issues left at that time. Hence, our focus since the resumption of our inspections in Iraq, two and a half months ago, has been verifying whether Iraq revived its nuclear programme in the intervening years. We have to date found no evidence of ongoing prohibited nuclear or nuclear related activities in Iraq. However, as I have just indicated, a number of issues are still under investigation and we are not yet in a position to reach a conclusion about them, although we are moving forward with regard to some of them.

what is there to ignore, the last conclusion was that there is no evidence of a nuclear program program and that they needed more time for some issues. Then the USA invaded and almost a year later we can conclude that there are no WMD

can you understand me now

edit: oh yeah, 2 of the ongoing issues at that time were the tubes and the Niger-Iraq uranium scam
we all know how reliable these issues were