• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Einstein Optimised Clients

It's actually an optimized APP, not the client if I read the thread correctly. So, there should be an increase of 2,5x to 5x, depending on the WU size, according to the thread.

I'll definitely try it next time I get to E@H.

Thx for the info Uli!!! :beer:

 
I guess I'll have to re-read the thread again as I've tried it on four machines and seen no difference in performance. 😕

*edit: Color me confused. I was misunderstanding how the performance increase would manifest itself. 😱 You won't see any difference in the benchmarks at all. You simply need to let the client run.. and believe me you will see a marked difference in the times being taken to crunch the work units!! 😀

On one particular P4 rig, I'm seeing workunits that used to take a little under 4h45m to crunch now taking 2h35m to finish! :Q That's HUGE! 🙂



 
my Athon64 3.200+ is doing his Work in 1:30, with the old Client about 4 Hours, that is fast i think...

Sir Ulli
 
Another example using an XP2400 rig that I have running the new app:

As you can see, before the new app, workunits were taking an average 15,800 to 15,950 seconds to complete; the 12,958 seconds was when I introduced the new app, and the 6,860 second figures are all completed workunits running fully thru the new app.

Double WHOA! 😎

"Claimed credit" is correspondingly lower because less time was needed to complete the workunits - no issues there.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top