Effective cancer cure is found, except you can't have it because of the FDA fraud

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
The inventor's name is Dr. Burzynski, he is a fellow Pole who discovered an effective cancer treatment but you can't have it because of the FDA's role and the fact that the US Government wanted to take over his patents...

Here is a documentary on Dr. Burzynski work (worth watching): -> Really, the movie is very well made and worth your time.
http://youtu.be/H0ibsoqjPac

Here is an excellent q&a with Dr. Oz (worth listening):
http://youtu.be/HVejUrKnh6E

If you think Dr. Burzynski is a fraud, he is quite persistent one, here is Dr. Burzynski talking publicly about his invention on a talk show in 1988:
http://youtu.be/UmXfKBwG_nI


Cliffs:
- Dr Burzynski invented new and apparently effective ways to treat cancer
- US Gov and big pharma want to get to his patents, so he was catching all kinds of hell during the last 30 years.
- His treatment works and it is non toxic.
- At this time, antineoplastons deserve to be massively studied everywhere, Dr Burzynski should get a Nobel prize, and be a billionaire by now.
- His medicine is currently undergoing a Phase 3 of medial trails - finally approved by the FDA. This means that Dr. Burzynski's treatment works.

"Shake your fists with anger"

:)

Enjoy and pass along.
 
Last edited:

Beev

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2006
7,775
0
0
Shit like this pisses me off. Someone tries to do something for the good of the people, but it eats into someones profits, barely, and the companies FLIP THEIR SHIT and do everything they can to keep it off the shelf. See: Who Killed the Electric Car

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
 
Last edited:

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Same shit with MMJ. It is far safer than the drugs they pump into AIDS and cancer patients, yet big Pharma cant patent it, so.......Schedule I for you!
 

crashtestdummy

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2010
2,893
0
0
Hey look! I can google search too!

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/canjclin.54.2.110/abstract

From the review:

Burzynski and Antineoplastons

Stanislaw Burzynski treats patients at a private clinic using what he terms antineoplastons, mixtures of peptides, amino acids, and other simple organic substances that are said to promote the body’s natural defenses against cancer.
Although he has published several studies of his own, these are of a rather unclear design.7 A Phase II trial in glioma conducted under the auspices of the National Cancer Institute was halted due to poor accrual, after Burzynski failed to agree with the investigators on possible expansion of the eligibility criteria. Nine patients were accrued, six of whom were able to be evaluated for response. There were no objective responses, and all six showed evidence of tumor progression after treatment durations of between 16 to 66 days. The mean time to treatment failure (progression or discontinuation due to toxicity) was 29 days. All nine patients died before the study closed, all but one death being due to tumor progression. Although the authors of the article claimed that the small sample size precluded “definitive conclusions,” the results of the patients in the trial are clearly extremely disappointing.8
It's very easy to create a woe-is-me conspiracy theory, but sometimes things just don't work.

Edit: The published clinical trial, if anyone is interested. It should be open access:

http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/74/2/137

RESULTS: Nine patients were treated, in six of whom the treatment response was assessable in accordance with protocol stipulations. No patient demonstrated tumor regression. Reversible grade 2 or 3 neurocortical toxicity, consisting of transient somnolence, confusion, and exacerbation of an underlying seizure disorder, was noted in five patients. Mean steady-state plasma concentrations of phenylacetate and phenylacetylglutamine after escalation to the target doses of A10 and AS2-1 were 177+/-101 microg/mL and 302+/-102 microg/mL, respectively. Patients who exhibited confusion tended to have higher phenylacetate levels.
 
Last edited:

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
If this was a real cure, sites outside of the US would be treating hundreds of thousands of patients for billions of dollars.

Google the doctor's made-up word "antineoplastons" to find rebuttals like this:
http://www.labspaces.net/view_blog.php?blogID=304

Sometimes the person really was born in Hawaii and isn't a sekrit Muslim . . . .
 

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
I only just started listening to it. This guy has a heavy accent. If the evil empire of the US of A FDA/big pharma/etc. is giving him such a hard time, why doesn't he get it approved elsewhere?
 

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
2
0
Kind of quick to jump to a conclusion there. Also, you make seem like there is only 1 type of cancer. There are multiple and I doubt 1 treatment could cure them all.
 

JimKiler

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2002
3,561
206
106
Hey look! I can google search too!

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/canjclin.54.2.110/abstract

From the review:

It's very easy to create a woe-is-me conspiracy theory, but sometimes things just don't work.

Edit: The published clinical trial, if anyone is interested. It should be open access:

http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/74/2/137

And if it did work and the US Govt was at fault this guy would have used it to treat patients in another company.

We are supposed to believe the same government that cannot plant a nuke or two in the Iraqi desert is denying a cure for cancer, possible but improbable.
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Just watch the video...
The FDA has attempted to shut him down for 20+ years; they failed.
The treatment works, it is not perfect, but the survival rate for some types of tumors is statistically significant - vs 0 for the current treatment.

Edit: Dr Burzynski has managed to amass a massive number of people who were treated by his method - who otherwise would not make it.
 
Last edited:

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
if it works why isn't it being used elsewhere?

oh, because it doesn't work.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
one rich cancer patient cured = mr quacky doctor has permanent support for life.

the rich own this government... so yea..... not likely he has the cure.
 

videogames101

Diamond Member
Aug 24, 2005
6,783
27
91
Guys, if he produced even one study that used a sound method for demonstrating a statistically significant increase in survival rates that could be reproduced then I would say "damn the FDA"; but in reality he hasn't shown a damn thing. In other words, he's mad.

I could give 1000 cancer patients granola bars and when 10 live claim that it was the chocolate chips that saved them, but who cares?
 
Last edited:

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
Just watch the video...
The FDA has attempted to shut him down for 20+ years; they failed.
The treatment works, it is not perfect, but the survival rate for some types of tumors is statistically significant - vs 0 for the current treatment.

Edit: Dr Burzynski has managed to amass a massive number of people who were treated by his method - who otherwise would not make it.

This is why I hate the FDA. If they can't shut down this quack, con artist preying on the sick in their greatest time of need then they are ineffective and a waste of resources.

This kind of quack science is how we end up with children not vaccinated.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
If it wasn't for the FDA crazy people like this guy would be killing millions by keeping people from seeking real treatment. Yea, damn those FDA!
 

videogames101

Diamond Member
Aug 24, 2005
6,783
27
91
Just watch the video...
The FDA has attempted to shut him down for 20+ years; they failed.
The treatment works, it is not perfect, but the survival rate for some types of tumors is statistically significant - vs 0 for the current treatment.

Edit: Dr Burzynski has managed to amass a massive number of people who were treated by his method - who otherwise would not make it.

This is an honest question. Do you know what that term means? What do you mean by it?