- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
I noticed that, too. My assumption had (still is) that you could track the F1 for a long time and still have strong braking.I'm honestly surprised about the McLaren. How are they cooking the brakes so easily? It's a 2700 lb race car!! Something wrong with their test car?
I think the F1 will go down in history as one of the best and most memorable cars ever built, everything they did to it was with a purpose and well thought out. The Veyron just seems like a luxury car with a honkin motor. I'd love to drive either, but I'd rather own the F1 I think.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_AtomF1. Driver focused. Dead on center.
We need affordable cars like this.
Could be the F1 they were testing didn't have slotted/drilled rotors. Not sure if that was stock or not but it would make a difference with steel rotors. Or it could be that he's noticing a small amount of fade whereas the Bugatti has none and that makes it more glaring and obvious.
Top Gear just did a side-by-side comparison of both cars a few months back. I believe the "race" was conducted in Dubai or the UAE. TG is falling out of favor with me personally but the race was exciting and the ____ won (if you didn't see it).
Yeah, I really think that article was complete BS. I understand they might not have been able to properly drive the cars on a dry track, but I can't help but feel the F1 would have killer on a short road course. Sure the Veyron has the power in the straights, but a 2+ ton luxury machine will never be as nimble as a 1.7 ton street-legal race car.
[/benchmark racing]
F1 > Veyron.
Did we conclude that the TG race in Dubai was bogus because of the altitude/heat affecting the Veyron turbos?