EDIT: I misjudged and see the error of my ways...upon further research...I have changed my mind.....

Wheezer

Diamond Member
Nov 2, 1999
6,731
1
81
ok so I was a bit hasty in my OP....sorry....upon further research I have come to the conclusion that there is a good possibility that this could happen....I hope that no one here goes through it....

Alternate source

A child porn possession charge lodged against a Department of Industrial Accidents investigator fired for having smut on his state-issued laptop has been dismissed because experts concluded he was unwittingly spammed.

?The overall forensics of the laptop suggest that it had been compromised by a virus,? said Jake Wark, spokesman for Suffolk District Attorney Daniel Conley.

Nationally recognized computer forensic analyst Tami Loehrs told the Herald Michael Fiola?s ordeal was ?one of the most horrific cases I?ve seen.?
Click here to find out more!

?As soon as you mention child pornography, everybody?s senses go out the window,? she said.

Loehrs, who spent a month dissecting the computer for the defense, explained in a 30-page report that the laptop was running corrupted virus-protection software, and Fiola was hit by spammers and crackers bombarding its memory with images of incest and pre-teen porn not visible to the naked eye.

Two forensic examinations conducted by the state Attorney General?s Office for the prosecution concurred with that conclusion, Wark said.

Still, Fiola, 53, whose wife, Robin, described as ?computer-illiterate,? wants his day in court. He intends to sue the DIA for ?destroying our lives.?

?Our lives have been hell,? said Fiola, a former state park ranger now living in Rhode Island. ?I hope to recover my reputation, but our friends all ran.?

DIA spokeswoman Linnea Walsh confirmed Fiola ?was terminated,? but declined to say if any internal discipline has been meted out as a result of his name being cleared in court.

?We stand by our decision,? she said.

Fiola?s attorney Timothy Bradl is at a loss to understand why.

?Imagine this scenario: Your employer gives you a ticking time bomb full of child porn, and then you get fired, and then you get prosecuted as some kind of freak,? he railed.

?Anybody who has a work laptop, this could happen to,? he said. ?Mike Fiola is a hunt-and-peck kind of computer guy. He can barely get on the Internet.?

Fiola?s troubles began in November 2006 when, seven years into a job probing workers? compensation fraud, DIA gave him a replacement laptop for one that was stolen.

Months later, DIA information technology officials noted that the data usage on Fiola?s Verizon wireless bill was 4 times greater than his colleagues?. After discovering the child porn , Commissioner Paul Buckley fired him on March 14, 2007.

DIA turned the matter over to state police who, after confirming ?an overwhelming amount of images of prepubescent children engaged in pornographic poses? were stored on the laptop, persuaded Boston Municipal Court to issue a criminal complaint against Fiola in August 2007.

fter poring over the laptop, Loehrs reported to the court ?with 100-percent certainty that the laptop was compromised by numerous viruses and trojans, and may have been hacked by outside sources.?

?There is no evidence to support the claim that Michael Fiola was responsible for any of the pornographic activity,? she wrote.

All the porn, she said, was located in the laptop?s cache, a computer feature that stores copies of Web pages. Consistently, Loehrs? findings noted, there was ?no apparent origin or user interaction preceding the pornographic activity,? some of which was downloaded ?fast and furious.?

Wark said Fiola?s case was offically expunged from the court Tuesday.


 

RandomFool

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2001
3,913
0
71
www.loofmodnar.com
He could be innocent.

I remember there was a program that could be used to host files on a computer without the user knowing. You could transfer files to the the infected computer and then host the files on an IRC server. Can't remember the name of it.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
The author obviously knows nothing of the current malware trend. They don't flood people with popups anymore. They use the machine as part of a botnet, whether its relaying commands, updates, storing files, etc. And do this quietly.

The prosecution should have put the laptop back on a network and waited for activity. If its dead silent then they'd have a better case against anything automated.
 

SillyOReilly

Golden Member
Aug 11, 2007
1,532
6
81
Who knows if some type malware is the culprit or not. That's why you have due process to find out.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: RandomFool
He could be innocent.

I remember there was a program that could be used to host files on a computer without the user knowing. You could transfer files to the the infected computer and then host the files on an IRC server. Can't remember the name of it.

yeap. i remember hearing such things years ago. wich is why you keep an eye on the system
 

effowe

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2004
6,012
18
81
I couldn't find the article about this that I read this morning, but it includes more facts about the computer to make it much more plausible. For instance, the guy had received the laptop from the company. They gave it to him right after someone else had used it, so they just made him a user account and set him on his way. They didn't take the time to reconfigure the way the Virus program updated itself, so that was never updated. Apparently the update program was trying to log in with the old user's name, and since it was a different user name, he was unprotected. There were many other things in there but I can't remember, let me try to find it.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
This is very possible, plausible and probably what really happened. It's not even hard to believe, it actually happens. Whoever wrote that article really doesn't know what they are talking about.
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
I know a person who went to jail for possessing a compromised server that was used to hold child pronography.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: randay
I know a person who went to jail for possessing a compromised server that was used to hold child pronography.

that is such bullshit. its like if you buy a 20 year old house and after 5 years you decide to replace the carpet and when the carpet installers rip up the old carpet they find kiddie porn and you go to jail even though it was not your nor did you know it was there.

 

FDF12389

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2005
5,234
7
76
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: randay
I know a person who went to jail for possessing a compromised server that was used to hold child pronography.

that is such bullshit. its like if you buy a 20 year old house and after 5 years you decide to replace the carpet and when the carpet installers rip up the old carpet they find kiddie porn and you go to jail even though it was not your nor did you know it was there.

My thoughts exactly.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: randay
I know a person who went to jail for possessing a compromised server that was used to hold child pronography.

that is such bullshit. its like if you buy a 20 year old house and after 5 years you decide to replace the carpet and when the carpet installers rip up the old carpet they find kiddie porn and you go to jail even though it was not your nor did you know it was there.

Yes because you are in current posession of it. Who cares if you have no idea, nor could you, that it's there. You must burn in the fires of hell because somebody else is disgusting, finds children attractive, and uses your computer to hold the pictures because they are so scared of getting caught for their disgusting fetish.

Sigh sometimes our justice system amazes me.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: effowe
I couldn't find the article about this that I read this morning, but it includes more facts about the computer to make it much more plausible. For instance, the guy had received the laptop from the company. They gave it to him right after someone else had used it, so they just made him a user account and set him on his way. They didn't take the time to reconfigure the way the Virus program updated itself, so that was never updated. Apparently the update program was trying to log in with the old user's name, and since it was a different user name, he was unprotected. There were many other things in there but I can't remember, let me try to find it.

It's up on /.

Basically you have it right. The guy got a laptop from the company which belonged to a previous user. They just changed the login name and sent him on his way. The virus and patching software was configured for the old login so they didn't work. He was using a compromised computer from day 1.

Also, the defense expert said that from time stamps she could see that he would be on a work related website for 5-10 minutes filling out a form. In that time child porn would pop up in his cache from nowhere. Other times he was hitting over 40 websites per minute while simultaneously doing work.

And actually, very little of it was child porn. Most of it was "bizarre" porn apparently...