They would undo the imbalancing policies. They would reform the corrupt spending which directs the nation's treasuries into unneeded industries who are politically powerful, and back into the common good - infrastructure, education, healthcare, anti-poverty. They would set the nation back on a painful course of fiscal responsibility and prevent the disastrous course of bankruptcy.
John, first, as I said, it does simply come down to whose interests the people are representing. When it's the ultra wealthy, the policies that may come out can include anything from income tax cuts for the wealthy, to the end of the estate tax, to labor policies which lower wages and increase profits - but they all have the same net effect for the wealthy.
And leaders who represent the larger public can have a lot of policies but what's important is how they affect the nation.
I tried to add a touch of detail as well:
They would undo the imbalancing policies. They would reform the corrupt spending which directs the nation's treasuries into unneeded industries who are politically powerful, and back into the common good - infrastructure, education, healthcare, anti-poverty. They would set the nation back on a painful course of fiscal responsibility and prevent the disastrous course of bankruptcy.
Beyond that, we get into wonk-speak about specific tax credits to increase or decrease, other tax adjustments, labor policy, on and on which I think is neither good reading nor keeping the cart behind the horse - what we need is the political support for the right group, the rest is not nearly so important now.
It's not that I want to fall back on 'vote for our party because it's for prosperity' - the same empty slogan promised but not fulfilled by 25 years of republicans - as that I"m trying to make the point that I think the key issue is simply whose interests will be represented. And I'm not a wonk to ramble on tax credits anyway.
I can ramble on some big picture issues a moment, though - for one, I think there is huge waste because of the corruption in the military-industrial revolving door, and we need to fix that and free up a lot of money. I'd raise the floor on the estate tax and keep it in place. This money could end borrowing from social security and fix its issues.
I'd ask economists to create a *balanced* economic plan which finds a way for America to be competitive in the increasingly global economy while protecting our own wealth. Free trade agreements which harm workers excessively and cripple elected governments' powers to regulate would be abolished.
A small amount of returning to some government-run things would be evaluated where it makes sense, ending the ideological phobia we have of programs that work great.
Taxes would be set at a balanced level which would return the nation to a healthier distribution of income, while preserving healthy rewards and incentives for our capitalist engine, as we should. Economic planning would be longer term, not aimed at rewarding a small segment now as a reward.
Tax dodges letting hundreds of billions leak out for the most wealthy would be closed.
There is a lot of wealth in the nation for the average citizen, and for investing in the nation's growth, if the spending priorities are fixed.