miketheidiot
Lifer
- Sep 3, 2004
- 11,060
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Originally posted by: Cattlegod
Similar to engineering theories - economic theories rely on a ideal situations and rational people. Because ideal situations do not exist, and people are not rational, anomalies will be created.
I think there's even more to it. I think their economic theories are wrong even in an ideal situation.
Look at this article: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc...12/blodget-wall-street
Part of it talks about what happened in the real estate market. You'll see that at each point in the real estate buying chain, people were acting rationally. True, they weren't necessarily acting with perfect information (that's another problem. Economists seem to think that people and markets have perfect information. How exactly can information violate the laws of entropy and thermodynamics when nothing else can?) but then again perfect information is never available. If only economists would consider people to be heavily flawed and imperfect, their theories wouldn't be so nonsensical.
here is the thing, most economists know all this. Economists know that people don't have information and know they aren't rational. Unfortunately, they never teach business students about market failure, nash equilibriums, economic history, reality, etc; they just get the basic models and assume that that's how reality is. When i got into my intermediate micro theory class, the first thing that my professor said was that we should forget everything we learned in freshman classes.
And also, since economists have never been able to predict recession accurately, macroeconomics can't be considered a science.
actually, they are pretty good at that