• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Economic activity expands on stong retail sales

Engineer

Elite Member
Click me!

Even with manufacturing jobs being lost, productivity is still on the rise for the US worker. It is very encouraging to see manufacturing pick up. Let's hope that some of this translates to trade deficit reduction. Strong to mildly strong numbers across the board.

Let's also hope that inflation keeps in check and that Greenspan and crew doesn't have to do too large a rate hike in interest rates. On 2nd thought, I don't have debt, only savings, so I don't mind! 😉

WASHINGTON - The economy flashed fresh signals of strength in the last two months, with factories buzzing and cash registers ka-chinging despite high gas prices.

ADVERTISEMENT

The latest snapshot emerging from the Federal Reserve's survey of the business climate around the country, released Wednesday, suggested the economy has bounced back nicely from a springtime soft patch. The job market showed some improvements and inflation was fairly contained, the survey also found.

The picture was consistent with the assessment Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan offered last week when he delivered the central bank's midyear economic outlook to Congress.

At that time, Greenspan signaled that short-term interest rates will continue to move higher in the months ahead in an effort to keep the economy and inflation on an even keel. Economists widely expect Fed policymakers will boost rates by another quarter-percentage point at their next meeting, Aug. 9. The Fed's survey appears to support such a move.

Over the last year, the Fed has pushed a key interest rate to 3.25 percent in nine modest, quarter-point moves. Before the Fed embarked on its credit tightening, that key rate stood at 1 percent, a 46-year low.

Some analysts believe this key rate could climb as high as 4.25 percent by the end of this year.

In the survey, most of the Fed's 12 regional districts reported "moderate to solid expansions in manufacturing activity and expectations for future factory activity were generally upbeat." The survey also noted that "activity in a wide variety of manufacturing industries was characterized as strong."

Boston and San Francisco, for instance, reported strength in aircraft and high-tech manufacturing; Atlanta and Dallas said refineries were doing quite well. Several districts reported that producers of construction materials, especially cement, and industrial equipment also were busy. But makers of metals and textiles saw some weakness.

The Fed's survey is based on information collected before July 18.

Consumer spending, a key force behind economic activity, also was holding up well despite high energy prices, the survey suggested.

"Most districts reported increases in retail sales and reports on retailers' expectations were generally positive," the survey said.

Boston, however, reported sales were flat or down from a year ago, and New York said sales softened in early July, following solid growth in June.

Meanwhile, car sales in nearly all of the Fed's regions were boosted by a new round of price discounting. And, tourism continued to show strength throughout much of the country, the report said.

The housing market remained hot, but showed a "few signs of cooling" in some districts, the survey said. House activity and home price appreciation in Massachusetts moved from "hot" to "normal." In the Richmond, Atlanta and San Francisco districts housing activity stayed strong but "eased in a few markets that had been especially hot ? Washington, D.C., several Florida markets and parts of southern California."

Oil prices surged to a new closing high of $61.28 a barrel in early July. Gasoline prices earlier this month set a record of $2.33 a gallon nationwide, the Energy Department reported.

Yet, inflation was contained in most Fed districts, the survey suggested.

"Overall price pressures either eased slightly or remained unchanged in most districts despite substantial increases in the cost of energy and some building materials," the report said.

Transportation firms in the Chicago, Cleveland and Dallas areas were able to pass much of their increased fuel costs to customers, the report said. "However, in a number of districts, firms outside the transportation sector were reported as having only limited success passing on cost increases."

On the employment front, demand for workers increased in most Fed districts, but New York said labor markets were a bit softer overall despite a pickup in hiring at financial services. Several districts reported stronger demand for temporary workers. Skilled workers were in shorter supply in some areas, truck drivers were reported as scarce in Cleveland, Richmond and Atlanta.

The nation's unemployment rate dropped to 5 percent in June, the lowest level in nearly four years.

Even with the labor market improvements, wage pressures ? a barometer of inflation ? remained moderate, the Fed said.
 
Paul Harvey was reporting that factory orders rose for a 3rd month in a row. I don't know what the prior two months' percentages were but he said 1.4% for the last month.
 
Oh wait...here's some detail on those factory orders:

http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/m3/
New Orders
New orders for manufactured durable goods in June increased $2.9 billion or 1.4 percent to $215.4 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. This followed a 6.4 percent May increase.

Shipments
Shipments of manufactured durable goods in June, down following three consecutive monthly increases, decreased $0.2 billion or 0.1 percent to $207.9 billion. This followed a 0.2 percent May increase.

Unfilled Orders
Unfilled orders for manufactured durable goods in June, up for the second consecutive month, increased $14.6 billion or 2.6 percent to $579.4 billion. This was at the highest level since the series was first stated on a NAICS basis in 1992 and followed a 2.1 percent May increase.

Inventories
Inventories of manufactured durable goods in June, down two of the last three months, decreased $0.8 billion or 0.3 percent to $291.1 billion. This followed a 0.1 percent May increase.

Capital Goods Industries
Nondefense
Nondefense new orders for capital goods in June decreased $1.5 billion or 1.9 percent to $80.3 billion.

Defense
Defense new orders for capital goods in June increased $1.2 billion or 16.9 percent to $8.5 billion.
Some mixed news in there but certainly good for the military-industrial complex.

And, it looks like Paul Harvey's comment, while accurate, doesn't show a much smaller increase from May's increase.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Oh wait...here's some detail on those factory orders:

http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/m3/
New Orders
New orders for manufactured durable goods in June increased $2.9 billion or 1.4 percent to $215.4 billion, the U.S. Census Bureau announced today. This followed a 6.4 percent May increase.

Shipments
Shipments of manufactured durable goods in June, down following three consecutive monthly increases, decreased $0.2 billion or 0.1 percent to $207.9 billion. This followed a 0.2 percent May increase.

Unfilled Orders
Unfilled orders for manufactured durable goods in June, up for the second consecutive month, increased $14.6 billion or 2.6 percent to $579.4 billion. This was at the highest level since the series was first stated on a NAICS basis in 1992 and followed a 2.1 percent May increase.

Inventories
Inventories of manufactured durable goods in June, down two of the last three months, decreased $0.8 billion or 0.3 percent to $291.1 billion. This followed a 0.1 percent May increase.

Capital Goods Industries
Nondefense
Nondefense new orders for capital goods in June decreased $1.5 billion or 1.9 percent to $80.3 billion.

Defense
Defense new orders for capital goods in June increased $1.2 billion or 16.9 percent to $8.5 billion.
Some mixed news in there but certainly good for the military-industrial complex.

And, it looks like Paul Harvey's comment, while accurate, doesn't show a much smaller increase from May's increase.


Hmm...general manufacturing seems to be in a mixed bag. I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity. GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.
 
I am sure that GMs sales last month had nothing to do with current productivity or shipments. They were all accounted for when the vehicles were built and shipped. If anything, it helped GMs massive ineventories.

The real facts behind these numbers are that the manufacturing base in America is indeed doing fine. Loss of jobs have been offset by increases in productivity - this is to be expected as increased productivity generally means there is the need for fewer workers. So, before people fly off the handle and accuse China, NAFTA, CAFTA, etc... as being the root cause of manufacturing job losses, look internally. The losses are (and have traditionally been) linked to productivity.

Now a short lesson on economic cycles - particularly when manufacturing is involved...

1. Economy tanks. Manufacturing orders drop.

2. Economy slowly recovers. Employment is a lagging indicator and this is when most people lose their jobs - typically temporarily.

3. As recovery increases management is faced with a dilemma. Hire more people or squeeze the most out of what you have (equipment and personnel wise). The general strategy here is to sit and wait to see if the recovery is the real deal. This is typically why most recoveries have a few slight dips on the way up. This is alsp why employment lags.

4. Economy is at full blast and orders are back up to normal. Faced with the earlier decision, management is left with the cream of the crop in terms of employees, they typically opt to get new equipment at this point. Which is good as it contributes to more economic growth. This also leads to increases in productivty, as not only do you have your best employees only but you have equipment operating at full capacity.

5. At some point the new equipment that has been earlier ordered and since installed (can take some time) must be manned. This is typically one to three years after the economy has fully recovered. Management makes the expensive decision to hire new employees.

6. Ride it until it busts again...
 
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.


Hmmm....? 😕
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.

What the hell are you talking about? You are seriously demented.
 
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.

What the hell are you talking about? You are seriously demented.

Yep I may be "seriously demented" but at least I am not so easily duped by phoney numbers like the rest of the American Sheeple.

This time it will be attributed to GM's Bull Employee Marketing ply, next will be Ford's and finally Dodge, then this Administration will find another Indistry to prop up the phoney numbers.


 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.

What the hell are you talking about? You are seriously demented.

Yep I may be "seriously demented" but at least I am not so easily duped by phoney numbers like the rest of the American Sheeple.

This time it will be attributed to GM's Bull Employee Marketing ply, next will be Ford's and finally Dodge, then this Administration will find another Indistry to prop up the phoney numbers.


Dave,

As much as it pains me to say so, irwincur is probably right about GM. They had vastly overproduced during the last few years and were simply clearing out inventory, not new manufacturing. Actually, GM (and the others) took three weeks shutdown this year vs two from previous years (for model changeover). This shows how the market was vastly saturated with new cars sitting in lots waiting to be shipped.

I just hope that the average citizen isn't sinking so much more into debt to make this happen. Ah hell, why do I care about that. I'm almost out of debt. Let them take my 401k/investments for a ride at the expense of their debt so I can retire early! 😀
 
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: ntdz
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Engineer
I would guess GM's surge of new car sales helped account for some of the activity.

GM is now dropping the employee pricing to the public deal, which may hurt sales.

I hope that a rise continues....many more jobs than most folks realize depend on it.

Baaaaa always a new excuse for the phoney numbers.

What the hell are you talking about? You are seriously demented.

Yep I may be "seriously demented" but at least I am not so easily duped by phoney numbers like the rest of the American Sheeple.

This time it will be attributed to GM's Bull Employee Marketing ply, next will be Ford's and finally Dodge, then this Administration will find another Indistry to prop up the phoney numbers.


Dave,

As much as it pains me to say so, irwincur is probably right about GM. They had vastly overproduced during the last few years and were simply clearing out inventory, not new manufacturing. Actually, GM (and the others) took three weeks shutdown this year vs two from previous years (for model changeover). This shows how the market was vastly saturated with new cars sitting in lots waiting to be shipped.

I just hope that the average citizen isn't sinking so much more into debt to make this happen. Ah hell, why do I care about that. I'm almost out of debt. Let them take my 401k/investments for a ride at the expense of their debt so I can retire early! 😀

He wasn't just talking about GM, he was selling you the Brooklyn Bridge and you bought it.

 
Back
Top