• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Eat less, live longer?

Fausto

Elite Member
This isn't a "new" story per se, but there's a blip at the beginning of the most recent National Geographic mentioning this that got me digging through journal articles and such. There have been several scientific studies indicating that a reduced calorie diet can lead to greatly increased longevity in mice and there's some evidence as well that this phenomenon may extend to humans as well.


One recent study: "Gene Expression Profile of Aging and Its Retardation by Caloric Restriction"

The gene expression profile of the aging process was analyzed in skeletal muscle of mice. Use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays representing 6347 genes revealed that aging resulted in a differential gene expression pattern indicative of a marked stress response and lower expression of metabolic and biosynthetic genes. Most alterations were either completely or partially prevented by caloric restriction, the only intervention known to retard aging in mammals. Transcriptional patterns of calorie-restricted animals suggest that caloric restriction retards the aging process by causing a metabolic shift toward increased protein turnover and decreased macromolecular damage.


A synopsis of the study's findings by CBS.

In the Wisconsin laboratory study, the researchers fed one group of mice a regular diet while restricting by 24 percent the calories in the food given to another group. The diets all contained healthful levels of vitamins, minerals and proteins. Only the calories were reduced. This creates a condition of undernutrition, but not malnutrition, Weindruch said.

After 30 months, muscles were taken from the animals and the activity of 6,347 genes was analyzed.

``We chose muscle for analysis because it is an important target for the effects of aging,'' said Weindruch. ``Muscle is lost routinely with old age and contributes to physical frailty.''

The researchers found that more than 100 genes either increased or decreased their activity with age.

``At the molecular level, normal aging looks like a state of chronic injury in muscle,'' said Prolla.

However, for mice fed the restricted diet, about 84 percent of the genetic alterations associated with aging were completely or partially suppressed.


Another relevant tidbit:

Roth said the men whose biomarkers were similar to those of the calorie-restricted, long-lived rodents were dying at a much slower rate than were men with other biomarker measurements. Roth said none of the Baltimore study's men are known to be on restricted diets, but clearly some are enjoying the same lifespan benefit that calorie restriction gave the laboratory animals and researchers are not sure why.

Anywho, just thought this was interesting. 🙂

 
Originally posted by: davee
its a long established idea
Right, but the research I linked (which you obviously didn't bother to read) is starting to delve into the actual mechanisms linking reduced calorie diets and aging. Read before you crap, please.

 
Yeh, this has definitely been around for a while and unfortunately I think is true, bummer :disgust:
 
I've heard it before and it makes sense, but isn't appropriate info for most people since most can't restrict their calories anyway 😉

Kinda like "Excercise, live longer?" 😀

But really it does make sense because if you're cranking 4000 calories through your body a day that's a lot of work your digestive system has to do, among other things.
 
Okinawa used to have the highest percentage of population over the age of 100. But as western foods such as Mcdonalds invaded the island, the newer generations aren't living near as long.
 
Originally posted by: rudder
Okinawa used to have the highest percentage of population over the age of 100. But as western foods such as Mcdonalds invaded the island, the newer generations aren't living near as long.
You sure that isn't from Coral Calcium from okinawa? I've seen that infomercial 😱

 
Originally posted by: notfred
Who wants to live longer anyway? After 70, you're wearing a diaper and can barely walk, who cares if you die?
I know of people who live decently up until only a short time prior to death. And just because you die at 60 doesnt' mean you lived up to that age as well as somebody who dies at 80 was doing when they were 60. Chances are you're just a 60 year old wearing a diaper who can barely walk!

 
Originally posted by: Skoorb
I've heard it before and it makes sense, but isn't appropriate info for most people since most can't restrict their calories anyway 😉

Kinda like "Excercise, live longer?" 😀

But really it does make sense because if you're cranking 4000 calories through your body a day that's a lot of work your digestive system has to do, among other things.
It also seems to have quite a bit to do with generation of free radicals and all kinds of other good stuff that increase the rate of cell aging. The bit about all this that's going to be a really tough sell to the public is that the level of calories you need to intake every day is very, very low relative to what the average fat bastard is used to eating. Mattson suggests 1800-2200kcal per day for the average person in their 20's. That's right at my BMR, plus it's harder to make sure you're not missing vitamins/minerals/etc at that level. I guess broadly speaking tho, it provides more ammo for the "slim down a bit and you might make it past 55, you freaking blimps" theory. 😉

 
Originally posted by: notfred
Who wants to live longer anyway? After 70, you're wearing a diaper and can barely walk, who cares if you die?
My grandfather is 90 and pilots his own boat down to Bimini every year to compete in a marlin tournament. You can be old and functional, you just have to take care of yourself.

 
Originally posted by: notfred
Who wants to live longer anyway? After 70, you're wearing a diaper and can barely walk, who cares if you die?
Thats what people look like that are unheallthy (overweight, sick, etc.).

Age 70+ can be very healthy and active (INCLUDING an active sex life).

But since you don't believe it anyway, continue abusing your bodies. 😛
 
Oldest Man in U.S. Dies at 113
Tue Feb 25, 5:36 PM ET Add Health - Reuters to My Yahoo!



NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Born when the horse and buggy was king, the oldest man in America, John McMorran of Lakeland, Florida, died of heart failure Monday at the age of 113.


McMorran was the second-oldest person in the United States, just seven days younger than the oldest living American, Mary Christian of San Pablo, California, who was born June 12, 1889.


He was also the fourth-oldest person in the world, trailing a Japanese woman, 115-year-old Kamato Hongo, who continues to hold the top spot.


As reported in The Ledger of Lakeland, McMorran had no secret to his extreme longevity other than being "well put together," according to great-granddaughter Lisa Saxton, 35. "He smoked cigars, drank beer and ate greasy food (much of his life)," she told The Ledger. "He was an amazing man."


McMorran only gave up cigars relatively recently, at 97.


The Michigan native was born into a rural farming family on June 19, 1889. Too old to be drafted into the army during World War I, McMorran plied various trades, working at a Detroit munitions factory during the war, then as a milkman and later as a mailman. He retired at 84, moving to Lakeland in 1990.


According to friends and relatives, McMorran enjoyed good health until just last week.


"He was never sick. He lived a great life," Saxton said.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=571&ncid=751&e=5&u=/nm/20030225/hl_nm/old_dead_dc
 
Originally posted by: notfred
Who wants to live longer anyway? After 70, you're wearing a diaper and can barely walk, who cares if you die?
I read in one of my runner's worlds that an 86 year-old man still does the IRON-man competition every year. Obviously age doesn't affect him

This is definitely good news for me if it extends to humans!

-Aunix "the anorexic" 😉
 
Mattson suggests 1800-2200kcal per day for the average person in their 20's.
I take in 1700/day when I'm dieting, although on "off" days I'm most comfortable around 3300-3500. 1800-2200 for the rest of my life is, uh, not likely to be very fun 😉
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Oldest Man in U.S. Dies at 113
Tue Feb 25, 5:36 PM ET Add Health - Reuters to My Yahoo!



NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Born when the horse and buggy was king, the oldest man in America, John McMorran of Lakeland, Florida, died of heart failure Monday at the age of 113.


McMorran was the second-oldest person in the United States, just seven days younger than the oldest living American, Mary Christian of San Pablo, California, who was born June 12, 1889.


<<snip>>

"He was never sick. He lived a great life," Saxton said.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=571&ncid=751&e=5&u=/nm/20030225/hl_nm/old_dead_dc
'
That's an example of very good genetics. I had a great-grandfather who smoked cigars all day long, ate a lot of fried food and lived to be 103. This is the exception rather than the rule.

 
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: davee
its a long established idea
Right, but the research I linked (which you obviously didn't bother to read) is starting to delve into the actual mechanisms linking reduced calorie diets and aging. Read before you crap, please.

dude its early try the highly intelligent forum with your research
 
Originally posted by: davee
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: davee
its a long established idea
Right, but the research I linked (which you obviously didn't bother to read) is starting to delve into the actual mechanisms linking reduced calorie diets and aging. Read before you crap, please.

dude its early try the highly intelligent forum with your research
The special ed forum is down the hall to your left.....need a map? 😉
 
I know.. 😀 I just couldn't help posting it.


When I heard the studies about eating less increasing your life expectancy it seemed logical to me. So many people (myself included) are emotional eaters and eat what they feel like eating.. but the body is slightly more complicated than "Meat and Potatoes" 🙂
 
Back
Top