I've been wondering, is a 9550 faster clock per clock than a 955 BE?
Depending on the review, the Q9550 is faster than the 955. At the very least, they're comparable with each CPU having different strengths.I've been wondering, is a 9550 faster clock per clock than a 955 BE?
Thanks for the info.
I'm currently running at 432x9 = 3.89Ghz with the E8400.
I know that getting 3.9Ghz out of a Q9550 will be difficult, if not impossible, with my current MB and RAM. Assuming the C2Q is a decent overclocker, any reason why I can't expect at least 432x8.5? Or will the C2Q likely result in a significantly lower stable FSB?
Thanks for the info.
I'm currently running at 432x9 = 3.89Ghz with the E8400.
I know that getting 3.9Ghz out of a Q9550 will be difficult, if not impossible, with my current MB and RAM. Assuming the C2Q is a decent overclocker, any reason why I can't expect at least 432x8.5? Or will the C2Q likely result in a significantly lower stable FSB?
