I can get one of the above processors for about 50% off current market prices and would like to know what would be best for me if I want the best bang for the buck, taking into account total cost of ownership (electric running 6-8 hours m-f, 16 hours sa-su), cost of other components in order to maximize the performance of the cpu of choice, etc.
I don't want to pay a premium for RAM or get a chip because it's cheap yet offers competitive performance when OC'd yet will cost me more in the long run due to electricity costs, etc.
I am not a hardcore gamer but would like to be able to play the latest & greatest games once in a while on a 24" lcd with full eye candy while also having background processes run
w/o one interfering with the other. I hear, when OC'd, the q6600 is pretty competitive with the top end processors, but wonder if its higher power consumption and heat will make it more costly in the long run. I know the q6600 is 65nm and the e8400 and q9xxx are 45nm.
I think the q6600 costs 50% more than the q9300, and is about the same price as the e8400, with the other q9xxx cpus costing a bit more.
I intend to upgrade probably once every 12-18 months, replacing CPU/mobo combo
for something new.
Value is the most important thing for me. I don't want to pay 50% more for a 7% performance gain, for example. I plan to use the cpu for a year or year and a half and
sell it without losing much of what I paid, then upgrade to something else at that time.
I was looking at an e2180 for about $70 but if I can get a q6600 for $30 more or one of the other chips at similarly good prices, I think the e2180 doesn't end up looking like as good a value.
If some of you who are more knowledgeable and experienced can provide your input, that'd be greatly appreciated!
I don't want to pay a premium for RAM or get a chip because it's cheap yet offers competitive performance when OC'd yet will cost me more in the long run due to electricity costs, etc.
I am not a hardcore gamer but would like to be able to play the latest & greatest games once in a while on a 24" lcd with full eye candy while also having background processes run
w/o one interfering with the other. I hear, when OC'd, the q6600 is pretty competitive with the top end processors, but wonder if its higher power consumption and heat will make it more costly in the long run. I know the q6600 is 65nm and the e8400 and q9xxx are 45nm.
I think the q6600 costs 50% more than the q9300, and is about the same price as the e8400, with the other q9xxx cpus costing a bit more.
I intend to upgrade probably once every 12-18 months, replacing CPU/mobo combo
for something new.
Value is the most important thing for me. I don't want to pay 50% more for a 7% performance gain, for example. I plan to use the cpu for a year or year and a half and
sell it without losing much of what I paid, then upgrade to something else at that time.
I was looking at an e2180 for about $70 but if I can get a q6600 for $30 more or one of the other chips at similarly good prices, I think the e2180 doesn't end up looking like as good a value.
If some of you who are more knowledgeable and experienced can provide your input, that'd be greatly appreciated!