E6500 Wolfdale vs E6750 Conroe

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
Trying to decide which to go for either a new E6500 or a used E6750. Nothing fancy needed, just needed for Hardware Virtualization support on a system thats mainly used for pretty basic stuff. The most taxing thing i'll do is stream an HD movie here and there.


Intel&#174; Pentium&#174; Processor E6500 (2M Cache, 2.93 GHz, 1066 FSB, 45nm) - $75 new
Intel&#174; Core&#8482;2 Duo Processor E6750 (4M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1333 MHz FSB, 65nm) - $55 used
 
Last edited:

toyota

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
12,957
1
0
why would you even consider that 3 year old used cpu when the new one will match it while being more efficient?
 

aphex

Moderator<br>All Things Apple
Moderator
Jul 19, 2001
38,572
2
91
why would you even consider that 3 year old used cpu when the new one will match it while being more efficient?

I assume you feel the same about the E6300 - 2.8ghz variant?
 

OBLAMA2009

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2008
6,574
3
0
why wouldnt you just spend 10 more and get the 6800 at 3.3ghz. that is going to be waaay better
 

nenforcer

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2008
1,779
20
81
Well here is the Anandtech bench with the Pentium E6300 2.8GHz

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/60?vs=94

Personally, I prefer the higher cache as you can see it does make a slight difference in certain benchmarks but not all.

There is a reason why one is branded a Pentium while the other is a called a true Core 2 Duo.

The debate for me is are you willing to buy used and does it come with the heatsink and fan. If it does for a lower price you might be impressed.
 

dbcooper1

Senior member
May 22, 2008
594
0
76
I'd buy the new one just for lower power usage and the warranty; sounds like the performance of either will be more than enough, so that's not an issue. Just make sure whatever board you plan to use supports 45nm and/or 1333 speed.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
With the usage you're talking about, I'd get the cheaper of the two options. They'll be virtually identical in performance.