E Opterons out.

phr0m

Senior member
Dec 25, 2004
384
0
0
when do you think the desktop processor will all start to be moved to the 90nm area?
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: phr0m
when do you think the desktop processor will all start to be moved to the 90nm area?



ermm.... most amd desktops (at least the big sellers) are already 90nm. :confused:
 

CheesePoofs

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2004
3,163
0
0
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: phr0m
when do you think the desktop processor will all start to be moved to the 90nm area?



ermm.... most amd desktops (at least the big sellers) are already 90nm. :confused:

I think he might have meant when will the desktop revision e's come out
 

gobucks

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,166
0
0
i'd imagine pretty soon - especially now that the 4000+ and 3800+ had nice price drops today, I doubt AMD's gonna want to pay to make them as 130nm chips when pretty much every 90nm part AMD makes can easily hit those 2.4GHz+ speeds. Of course, I hope they don't come out TOO soon or I'll be mad I didn't wait to get one, lol.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
I guess this means AMD has ironed out any kinks in their 90nm process since they're moving the Opteron line to 90nm which require absolute stability.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Good call Jeff...did you really order that 3500 setuP>?

I may have waited..exciting times on desktop next 1-2 months. Rev E's should be here..800XL may be retail price for a nice PCIe card....Bullhead enthusiasts boards which have superior mem performance should be here... well I guess it's always that way..wait wait wait.:p
 

clarkey01

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2004
3,419
1
0
AMD have been running 90 nm tech since May 2004 (well, whats been said) so I hope they have smoothed out any kinks( crossing my fingers for 3 Ghz+)
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Two things I'm waiting for too :)

Hey need to make sure rev E's work inside Abit board first.. They say CG rev only on site.. So no old C0s and maybe not these..
 

bersl2

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2004
1,617
0
0
Might this be a consequence of the black magic being used to permit unbuffered RAM?

I'm still rather suspicious of that board until more details come out about how they do it.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Nothing black magic about it. Remember Opteron only needs only registerd not ECC ram. The only purpose of registerd ram is to solve clock issues with the long traces. Notice this board only has two dimms per processor and I'd imagine is to solve the issue by having both short and good trace design so the data comes in at high enough signal so opteron does'nt know you're even using unbuffered.. Opteron's memory controller won't be able to tell if the dimm buffered it for a cycle or not. Registered is exactly like unregistered memory but buffers a request in its register as a stability enhancing measure before sending it. The pins, protocol and data are all the same. And I bet ABIT has worked it out to leave Operon clueless as to what you're using..Well hope actually.:p
 

ribbon13

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2005
9,343
0
0
I have some Corsair 3200XL from my Socket A rig waiting to push an Opteron 242 to new levels.
 

clarkey01

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2004
3,419
1
0
My only problem with AMD is thier lack of informing, any ideas when Desktop dual cores are coming our way ? And how much clock speed bumbs are we going to see untill then ? Will Revision E be the last before dual core ?

When dual core comes out will single core be scarped ?

I betcha the revision E wont come with SS, I just have a bad feeling that there going to let everyone down again.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Originally posted by: Zebo
Good call Jeff...did you really order that 3500 setuP>?

I may have waited..exciting times on desktop next 1-2 months. Rev E's should be here..800XL may be retail price for a nice PCIe card....Bullhead enthusiasts boards which have superior mem performance should be here... well I guess it's always that way..wait wait wait.:p

Yeah I did... I mainly did it to set up my family with something that won't be out of date for a while since I may be moving soon. If I don't end up moving, well, then I'll have an Athlon-64 setup, lol.
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Originally posted by: ribbon13
I have some Corsair 3200XL from my Socket A rig waiting to push an Opteron 242 to new levels.

Did you listen to him at all?

You need Registered Memory. THat is unregistered/unbuffered memory. It wont work.

-Kevin
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Originally posted by: ribbon13
I can't wait!!!

I want some Abit WN-2S+ and Dual 242 Rev E action!!

what would be the performance of this board be like compared to the proven gaming rigs so far like DFI sli fx55 etc etc ????????

Would you see much of a performance increase? I ask this due to the fact that i thought only apps (like OS, i know that this will) had to be programmed to properly utilize threads on two simultaneous processors?

 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Well the games are not Multi-THreaded... yet, so with dual processors you might notice a small difference if you have some back ground programs/services running.

As for the performance comparison, the WN-2S+ will not OC nearly as far as the DFI. However no matter multi-threaded or not you will still be a little faster with 2 CPU's. THe DFI might be a little faster though because DFI board is tweaked for performance and OCing, whereas the WN-2S+ appears to be for performance, but it is still a server board, so stability is numero uno.

-Kevin
 

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
i surpose you right Gamingphreek, i surpsoe we will just have to wait until dual cores come out, instead of having a dream machine of 2 Optos in performance gaming rig (which would be a very tastey rig if it could be OCed)

quick question little bit of topic but ... but the new dual cores will they OC that well, i dont think they will...
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,029
32,494
146
These fockers keep finding a way to get money out of me! 3ghz+ on air I won't be able to say no to....
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
How come the new Opteron is getting is ass kicked most of the time by the new Xeon?

I didn't think the extra cache and the faster bus could make such a difference.

I guess more than 2 CPU's might make a difference, though.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
How come the new Opteron is getting is ass kicked most of the time by the new Xeon?

I didn't think the extra cache and the faster bus could make such a difference.

I guess more than 2 CPU's might make a difference, though.

Cause Intel finally gave the Xeon what it needs... memory bandwidth.
 

Gamingphreek

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
11,679
0
81
Also those aren't exactly Opteron friendly tests. I suspect if he did the entire benchmark sweet the Opteron would come out on top.

The Xeons are very nice chips, however, remember they consume a lot more power, which puts out a lot more heat, which makes you add more fans, which causes more noise. So there is a balance here of speed and efficiency. Also remember Intel has been scrambling to get different chips out while AMD is not releasing that many and is in no hurry.

-Kevin
 

Avalon

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2001
7,571
178
106
Once someone points me to a link with a rev E winchester for under $175, I'll be all over it.