Quick question for you guys:
I just purchased a EVGA GeForce 9400GT 1GB graphics card, because I wanted to replace my graphics card with one that has dual monitor capability. The EVGA card I bought, has 2 outputs, both of which are DVI-I dual link outputs. Both of my monitors have DVI-I and VGA ports. So, I was looking on eBay for cables (as I have no DVI ones), and I found that a DVI-I dual link to VGA adapter is only about $3... and an actual DVI-I -DVI-I cable is about $10-$12. So, is the quality of the DVI-I dual link really much better then that of a VGA? I mean, I only paid $26 for the whole graphics card (used on eBay)... so I only wanna spend $20 on the cables if the image quality would be significantly better. What do you guys think? Should I just go with DVI-I to VGA adapters (and just use 2 of my 20+ VGA cables), or spend the $15 extra for the actual DVI-I cables? Thanks for the input!
I just purchased a EVGA GeForce 9400GT 1GB graphics card, because I wanted to replace my graphics card with one that has dual monitor capability. The EVGA card I bought, has 2 outputs, both of which are DVI-I dual link outputs. Both of my monitors have DVI-I and VGA ports. So, I was looking on eBay for cables (as I have no DVI ones), and I found that a DVI-I dual link to VGA adapter is only about $3... and an actual DVI-I -DVI-I cable is about $10-$12. So, is the quality of the DVI-I dual link really much better then that of a VGA? I mean, I only paid $26 for the whole graphics card (used on eBay)... so I only wanna spend $20 on the cables if the image quality would be significantly better. What do you guys think? Should I just go with DVI-I to VGA adapters (and just use 2 of my 20+ VGA cables), or spend the $15 extra for the actual DVI-I cables? Thanks for the input!
Last edited:
