Hi All,
I have an 80GB WD (C and D) on IDE1 and an 80GB Seagate (E and F) on IDE 2. C is for Win and programs, D for games. E has the swap file at the beginning and the rest for storage, Photoshop "temp" file, F has backups and patches.
I also have a SCSI CD and CDR/RW setup.
I bought a DVD -R/-RW and wonder is it should go on IDE 2 as slave? If so, would burning be more efficient if the source files were on C or D as opposed to E or F?
Or should it go on IDE 1 as slave and use E or F for source files? Would the DVD as slave on IDE1 cause any slowdowns with the WD drive?
In other words, my thought is that any files to be burned (video editing, backups, etc) to the DVD drive should be on the opposite harddrive?
Any tips or comments welcome,
TIA,
Mike G
I have an 80GB WD (C and D) on IDE1 and an 80GB Seagate (E and F) on IDE 2. C is for Win and programs, D for games. E has the swap file at the beginning and the rest for storage, Photoshop "temp" file, F has backups and patches.
I also have a SCSI CD and CDR/RW setup.
I bought a DVD -R/-RW and wonder is it should go on IDE 2 as slave? If so, would burning be more efficient if the source files were on C or D as opposed to E or F?
Or should it go on IDE 1 as slave and use E or F for source files? Would the DVD as slave on IDE1 cause any slowdowns with the WD drive?
In other words, my thought is that any files to be burned (video editing, backups, etc) to the DVD drive should be on the opposite harddrive?
Any tips or comments welcome,
TIA,
Mike G
