- Oct 15, 2000
- 2,164
- 0
- 0
By now everyone knows how overclockable Durons are.... but I read this section in an Anandtech review and was confused.
"The Duron 800 is also not the best overclocking candidate as it is still using Aluminum interconnects. From what we've seen, only the Copper based cores from Dresden are really able to hit 1GHz and beyond reliably and on a large enough scale. While there may be some Aluminum cores to hit 1GHz, for the most part it seems like it'll take a Fab30 produced Duron to be a truly solid overclocker beyond what the current Durons are capable of reaching.
So as far as the Duron is concerned, chances are that the 800MHz parts won't get any higher than the 700MHz parts we've had around for the past couple of months. Meaning that 900 - 950MHz is the realistic max without getting into some more powerful cooling methods."
Does this mean that the theoretical max for Duron 800 isn't much better than a 6 or 700? Thanks. Gonna build overclocking system for the first time & just trying to read up on everything I can.
"The Duron 800 is also not the best overclocking candidate as it is still using Aluminum interconnects. From what we've seen, only the Copper based cores from Dresden are really able to hit 1GHz and beyond reliably and on a large enough scale. While there may be some Aluminum cores to hit 1GHz, for the most part it seems like it'll take a Fab30 produced Duron to be a truly solid overclocker beyond what the current Durons are capable of reaching.
So as far as the Duron is concerned, chances are that the 800MHz parts won't get any higher than the 700MHz parts we've had around for the past couple of months. Meaning that 900 - 950MHz is the realistic max without getting into some more powerful cooling methods."
Does this mean that the theoretical max for Duron 800 isn't much better than a 6 or 700? Thanks. Gonna build overclocking system for the first time & just trying to read up on everything I can.
