Dullard's College Football - Week 9, 2006

[b0mbrman]

I'm surprised that I, nor anyone else, for that matter, didn't notice this sooner. For all the ill will Dullard's ranking got in this thread, it's pretty close to the BCS computer ranking:

Rank - Team - BCS Computer Average
1 - Michigan - 1.00
2 - Ohio State - 0.96
3 - California - 0.89
4 - Florida - 0.85
5 - Notre Dame - 0.82
6 - USC - 0.8
7 - Auburn - 0.72
8 - Rutgers - 0.69
9 - Louisville - 0.68
10 - Tennessee - 0.66

The only huge discrepancies between Dullard and the BCS computers are Notre Dame (BCS has them at 5, Dullard has them at 14) and Rutgers (BCS 8, Dullard 16)

For those two teams, I don't think anyone would argue that Dullard's is less accurate

 

[b0mbrman]

Where I think the BCS rankings will go this coming week:

1 Ohio State
2 Michigan
3 Florida
4 Louisville
5 Auburn
6 West Virginia
7 Texas
8 USC
9 Notre Dame
10 California

Will Cal get knocked out of the 2 spot in your rankings because Tennessee lost? And it looks like LSU was right where it belonged

[Edit] And Louisville too! :Q

Well done :thumbsup: