Duke Nukem Forever beats Bulldozer

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
LOL,
Though I keep reading BD is not delayed !

It seems Evga and Nvidia are helping promote game/gpu packages.
http://www.evga.com/articles/00633/

Maybe there should be a good fun Razzies award for video games, it seems perfect for the most delayed game ever !
header.jpg
 

stahlhart

Super Moderator Graphics Cards
Dec 21, 2010
4,273
77
91
I can't think of a better company than EVGA for promoting a delayed product.

/P67 SLI Forever
 

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
Did they even have internet back when this game was started?

Good question, I had to refresh my dates. Apparently AOL DOS was out then. I got on through Windows/Prodigy in 93'.
Duke Nukem launched in 91' .
There was a internet, but not many were on it.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Duke Nukem Forever beats Bulldozer

I am literally stunned by this. I really thought that Duke Nukem's ability to dither, delay, drag-on, etc etc would trump AMD's (or GF's) ability to trip over their own feet on a new product release. Looks like US gets it on June 14, but everyone else got it today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem_Forever

Well, to be fair it also beat SB-E and IB and Larrabee and Haswell and Rockwell to market as well.

There's no shortage of yet-to-be-released products out there that are going to be released after DNF.

And nothing against the hard-working game developers out there, but you don't see games requiring multi-billion dollar fabs and multi-billion dollar R&D budgets for their development...the degree of difficulty in developing a video game versus developing a 32nm process node and the IC to be produced on it are a little bit different in scale/scope/magnitude. ;)
 

busydude

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2010
8,793
5
76
We waited 20 years,, its out WOW ,, what is this bs ,, othre countries get 3 day sooner. I dont like dat,,

You waited for 20 years man.. 3 days is not a big deal. Reviews are just trickling down now.. looks like a major disappointment.
 

Soundmanred

Lifer
Oct 26, 2006
10,780
6
81
Waited 20 years for what? DNF has only been in development for 12-13 years.
Of course this is from the guy who says "4 cores, 64 threads, wow lol kthx!"
 

Sniper82

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
16,517
0
76
DNF was supposedly in development for 10+ years but IMO thats not the case(more like past 2-3). Thats the half a$$ game we see today.
 
Last edited:

Voo

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2009
1,684
0
76
Well, to be fair it also beat SB-E and IB and Larrabee and Haswell and Rockwell to market as well.
Yeah thought that myself. Not a really useful comparison except for a catchy headline.


And nothing against the hard-working game developers out there, but you don't see games requiring multi-billion dollar fabs and multi-billion dollar R&D budgets for their development...the degree of difficulty in developing a video game versus developing a 32nm process node and the IC to be produced on it are a little bit different in scale/scope/magnitude. ;)
Well we're talking about a game that was in production for what? 12 years? And used 2?4? different engines, was released for a console whose predecessor didn't even exist when it was first planned, changed several development teams/producers in its life cycle.
One could say DNF is the closest thing game devs can come to developing their own CPU ;)

PS: Not that I'm especially interested in DNF - personally I think losing such a perfectly fine source of jokes for an average infantile shooter is a bad exchange, but oh well. Seems like ep3 is already working on establishing its own fame (and that's a much harder loss imho~)
 
Last edited:

slag

Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
10,473
81
101
The net started for consumer use when Windows 95 came out. I remember installing it with 22 disks LOL

I was using "the net" with Netscape back with windows 3.1. I vaguely having to install trumpet winsock the university gave me on a floppy disk so I could establish a net connection. That was probably a year or two before Windows 95 came out.
 

bridito

Senior member
Jun 2, 2011
350
0
0
Yep, I'd hope it's completely impossible for BD to get such bad reviews as DNF is getting.. although that's not saying much

I care not one whit about what Bulldozer does or does not do as I'm committed to SB-E as soon as it launches. I've tried to stay out of the Bulldozer yay or nay firing line as it seems to me that until fully independent tests are released it's fairly pointless to argue about something that remains unknown. If Bulldozer does turn out to be the DNF CPU it would be a very sad day for AMD as well as for anyone who believes in a competitive microprocessor market.