• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dual Opterons vs. Dual Xeons in SQL

Glavinsolo

Platinum Member
SQL does per processor licensing. Xeons have HT enabled. So I have 3 options

2 Opterons = 2 processors
2 Xeons = 4 processors
2 Xeons HT disabled = 2 processors

Can someone post in a reply actual performance graphs of all three of these setups?

With SQL as a benchmark.

A link would also be nice but it may be blocked.

Thanks
 
SQL charges fees per processor, even if that 'processor' is a logical processor from HT? Thats kinda fvcked up.
 
hyperthreading doesnt make a cpu act as 2 processors. it only allows for better multi-tasking, but is no where near dual cpu's.
 
Originally posted by: Glavinsolo
SQL does per processor licensing. Xeons have HT enabled.
I'm pretty sure a hyperthreaded CPU is considered a "single" CPU for SQL Server licensing purposes. In fact, didn't Microsoft recently announce that they would even consider the pending dual-core chips "single" CPU's for licensing purposes?
 
You are correct Sonoran MS SQL is going to be a one package=1cpu deal, at least for now. That being said, the poster didn't say which commercial SQl server he was using.
 
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2291

Dual CPU Database Server Comparison
December 2nd, 2004

The Opteron deals out a decisive blow to the Xeons in MySQL. We know from past experiences that when you run extremely complicated SQL statements, the Opterons were a lot faster. After this project, we also know that the Opteron is still the winner when you mix a lot of simple queries with a few heavier queries.
 
Back
Top