• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dual Opteron vs Dual Athlon MP

adkim

Junior Member
I'm trying to build a very high-performance, low-cost SMP workstation. I have narrowed down my decision to one of the following:

1. Dual Opeteron 240 (1.4GHz chips) (64-bit)

or

2. Dual Athlon MP 2800+ (2.08GHz chips)

Cost-wise, they are pretty close. I can't seem to find a good comparison of the two. And I can't make up my mind about which way to go. I'd like to find out which of the two will yield higher performance under winxp pro 32-bit. So, basically, I'd like to know what you guys think. I'm hoping that the Opterons will be faster (i.e., 64-bit capability, HyperTransport technology, and faster RAM support is enough to offset the difference in GHz marks). Educated responses only, please.

One more question. Regarding disk I/O performance, I have come to another cross road between:

1. 10,000RPM Seagate Cheatah U160 w/8MB cache on a 64bit PCI LSI Ultra 160 Controller (in a 64-bit PCI slot, of course)

or

2. Four (4) 40GB ATA133 Maxtors w/2MB cache on a Promise ATA133 Raid card in 4-disk-striped array (ala Raid 0)

TIA, for your comments.

 
What programs will you be running, and also what kind of storage do you want/need.

I would get a Pair of Raptor 74gig 10,000rpm drives and the opteron setup and run that.
 
If you don't consider the price difference to be significant go for the opterons. The MPX platform may have a lot of clockspeed compared to the opterons, but it is very bandwith limited as its limited to a 266Mhz FSB with PC2100. You are also sticking yourself to a more-or-less end-of-lifed platform. Also, the MPX chipset has some quirks with regard to PCI bandwith and you will not great performance if you use a RAID card on the regular 32 bit PCI slots. Finally, going with the opteron(though I would maybe go up to the 242 or even 244s) will give you a lot more room to upgrade as the socket will be supported a bit longer and you may be able to add faster procs later.
 
Originally posted by: aka1nas
If you don't consider the price difference to be significant go for the opterons. The MPX platform may have a lot of clockspeed compared to the opterons, but it is very bandwith limited as its limited to a 266Mhz FSB with PC2100. You are also sticking yourself to a more-or-less end-of-lifed platform. Also, the MPX chipset has some quirks with regard to PCI bandwith and you will not great performance if you use a RAID card on the regular 32 bit PCI slots. Finally, going with the opteron(though I would maybe go up to the 242 or even 244s) will give you a lot more room to upgrade as the socket will be supported a bit longer and you may be able to add faster procs later.

good synopsis. i had a dual MP1900 system. I will be building my new dual Opteron 240s next week. I will keep you all posted.
 
Back
Top