• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

dual integrated NICs

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: ch33zw1z
Originally posted by: Zap
Originally posted by: ch33zw1z
he doesnt sounds like much of a guru,

Dual NICs are great for some situations. Average user doesnt need it.
Installing a front, hydraulic Shovel in the front of a vehicle can be very useful.

Yet you would not see it advertised as an option for a Ferrari.

Why? Because it is hard to find a Gullible Ignorant that will fall for such Gimmick.

However, it is very easy to find them for spending $300 on a computer?s PSU, and add to it $250 Killer NIC.
 
The marketing people thrive on Ignorance.

There are some laws concerning ?Truth in Advertisings?, however there many ways to functionally bypass them.

Example, most Wireless manufacturers claim 300feet indoor capacity.

Do you know any one that get such an indoor distance with his wireless?

So how come there is No massive low suits.

Well you can create an Indoor situation where wireless would go up to 300feet.

Just build in a dry weather location 300? long storage facility and test the wireless from one side to the other while the hangar is empty.

Since the manufacturers do not claim 300? in your specific home or office, they are OK by law.

You have a lot of over the counter medications.

Unwise use of them is a serious risk.

Therefore, whose fault it is.

The Brand that make them available.

The Stores that sell them.

Or, the ignorant user that does not carefully read the label.




 
Back
Top