- Jan 13, 2001
- 8
- 0
- 0
Greetings:
I am building a Win2000 system to edit video and create Motion Graphics (ie. Adobe After Effects). The new Celerons have a 100MHz FSB, and you can purchase two of them for the same price as a single P III 700. Which would make the better image processing platform? The same question applies to two Duron 700s v. a single Athlon 700. If dual cheaper processors would indeed be better, which would be the better choice--Celeron or Duron?
I am building a Win2000 system to edit video and create Motion Graphics (ie. Adobe After Effects). The new Celerons have a 100MHz FSB, and you can purchase two of them for the same price as a single P III 700. Which would make the better image processing platform? The same question applies to two Duron 700s v. a single Athlon 700. If dual cheaper processors would indeed be better, which would be the better choice--Celeron or Duron?