Dual 30" Mac....DROOL!!!
- Thread starter Neurorelay
- Start date
Spikesoldier
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2001
- 6,766
- 0
- 0
aside from the fact taht i hate taht OP,
that is a pretty cool forum software. i like the interface.
that is a pretty cool forum software. i like the interface.
Spikesoldier
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2001
- 6,766
- 0
- 0
and here I was thinking about getting a 20" lcd to replace my 20" crt which sits here along side my 19" lcd
and I was thinking, boy its going to be big
you bastard, you robbed me of my possibly fake pride!
and I was thinking, boy its going to be big
you bastard, you robbed me of my possibly fake pride!
Very nice indeed. I think I'll stick with my cost effective yet aesthetically grotesque 17" CRT + 15" LCD setup for now though.
I use the 30 and it's ok but I would not want another sitting on the desk.
At 2560x1600, the native resolution is too low. It should be twice that (5120x3200) for finer pixel pitch. The WUXGA 15.1" display on my notebook at 1920x1200 look better. The 23" at the same resolution has the same issue.
The problem isn't with the size, it's the amount of pixels they're putting in there. It's like buying a printer that can print larger pages but at the same DPI. We need more DPI folks! No wonder they have clear type. (crap IMO)
LCD's at 1280x1024 (a poor aspect ratio) of up to 19 inches are available and these look absolutely horrible due to large pixel size. People will quickly blame the technology when it's not the issue at hand. I'm willing to bet a lot of them forget the era of .41 dp CRT monitors (and worse!).
Cheers!
At 2560x1600, the native resolution is too low. It should be twice that (5120x3200) for finer pixel pitch. The WUXGA 15.1" display on my notebook at 1920x1200 look better. The 23" at the same resolution has the same issue.
The problem isn't with the size, it's the amount of pixels they're putting in there. It's like buying a printer that can print larger pages but at the same DPI. We need more DPI folks! No wonder they have clear type. (crap IMO)
LCD's at 1280x1024 (a poor aspect ratio) of up to 19 inches are available and these look absolutely horrible due to large pixel size. People will quickly blame the technology when it's not the issue at hand. I'm willing to bet a lot of them forget the era of .41 dp CRT monitors (and worse!).
Cheers!
that setup in the first pic for the computer and monitors should run approximately $12-15k
:shocked:
:shocked:
what a freaking waste of money. Nobody needs more than a gig of ram right now unless they are involved in some rediculous workstation crap.........
TheLonelyPhoenix
Diamond Member
- Feb 15, 2004
- 5,594
- 1
- 0
Any game in the last 6 months will suck RAM up all the way to 1.5 - 2 GB.
Of course, it's a Mac, so that's a moot point.
Originally posted by: Fritzo
The ironic thing is, only Bill Gates would be rich enough to afford such a setup
Bill Gates' house was designed on a mac =)
Sure thing. Time is money. With 1GB of RAM, I would be buried so far in the paging file it wouldn't be funny.
Not everyone uses their computers for simple tasks.
Cheers!
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter