• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DSLR 600-1200 w/lens (60D, 600D, D5100)

GWestphal

Golden Member
I just sold my Nikon D40 and was looking to get a more modern camera that could do 1080p video so I don't have to drag around a point and shoot just for video.

I'm looking at Canon or Nikons and more specifically the Canon 60D, 600D and Nikon D5100.

I have no existing lens collection, so that isn't an issue.

Anyone have experiences, recommendations etc?
 
I'd say the D5100 has the edge in terms of photo quality, but if you're more interested in video, the Canons might be better.
 
D5100 has Continuous Auto Focus during video (subjective), but if you're an MF guy you could probably consider any of them. The 600D does have an edge in "optical" zoom (a feature the 60D doesn't have). The 550D also has hacked firmware that may better aid you in videography as well.
 
Nikons' have problem with live-view exposure in manual mode. Its bitrate is 2x lower (although it's more efficient than Canons', difference in quality is there.) On-board audio processor is worse. Does not offer various video mode that Canons do.

If video is your primary, Canon's offering is just better plus you can use a great custom picture style developed by Technicolor.
 
Here is an excerpt from a detailed (shortcut below) comparison between the D5100 and the Rebel T3i

"[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, san-serif]For those however considering to purchase a camera with the standard kit lens, we would recommend the Nikon D5100 kit with the AF-S DX 18-55mm VR zoom as offering the best solution, since the results delivered by the Canon EF-S 18-55mm IS II zoom lens when matched with a high resolution camera like the Rebel T3i display a fair amount of weakness in comparison. [/FONT]

[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, san-serif]In general, the Nikon D5100 with the standard Nikkor AF-S DX 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6G ED VR zoom offered better performance compared to the Canon Rebel T3i with the EF-S 18-55mm F/3.5-.5.6 IS II zoom kit lens. This is not only as a result of better optical lens design in the Nikon AF-S 18-55mm VR, but also because the lens is a more suitable match for the D5100's sensor. Another factor is that the D5100 incorporates technologies such as automatic 'Chromatic Aberration Correction' which are specifically designed to enhance lens performance.[/FONT]


[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, san-serif]Irrespective of the lens used, the Nikon D5100 offers better sensor output compared to the Canon Rebel T3i, especially in terms of minimizing digital noise when shooting at high ISO settings. The Nikon D5100 sensor offers improved colour depth, dynamic range and high ISO capability versus the Canon Rebel T3i / EOS 600D, as supported by our own and DxOMark Labs sensor comparison tests.[/FONT]


[FONT=Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, san-serif]If being able to shoot digital SLR type HD movies is an important requirement, then the Canon Rebel T3i / 600D offers advantages over the Nikon D5100 by providing manual exposure and added sound control features desired by more advanced users. "[/FONT]

http://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Canon-Rebel-T3i-EOS-600D-Compared-to-Nikon-D5100.shtml
 
I ended up with the 60D because I needed to get it today, because I'm leaving tomorrow. I think it's a reasonably good deal.

60D + 18-135 3.5-5.6 IS + UV filter+ Bag+extra battery+hood for $1400.
 
Video on my 60D is pretty good. Also, as a Canon owner I'm mature enough to admit the recent Nikon's have the edge in still frame quality, although you have to be really, really fussy to see it.

However, my 60D is nowhere near the quality of a $1,000 dedicated HD video camera. The amount of compression dSLR's apply to video is simply ridiculous.
 
Back
Top