sze5003
Lifer
- Aug 18, 2012
- 14,177
- 622
- 126
Problem is the prosecution knew exactly what to say to the jury to convict them. All they needed to do is put one doubt in the jury's mind and that's all. They painted a picture, even in the article it mentioned that prosecutor said he is the reason the drug trade continues because of his skill and expertise to build such compartments that he was helping the drug trade. That and the one dealer mentioned something in court about a kilo. Weather true or not that's all the jury needs to think that this guy is rotten and a lying drug trafficker.
Sucks and the jury system sucks as well. The prosecution knew exactly what to do to win this. He wouldn't snitch, so they need something they need a case and if its not them its you, that's what they are also paid for besides taking drugs off the street. So much for a war on drugs, wars at least end.
Sucks and the jury system sucks as well. The prosecution knew exactly what to do to win this. He wouldn't snitch, so they need something they need a case and if its not them its you, that's what they are also paid for besides taking drugs off the street. So much for a war on drugs, wars at least end.