• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

drug test...

A month for Urine and years for hair testing I believe i've heard, but im not certain.

Edit: could be a week for urine and months for hair testing.
 
How much do you/did you smoke?

If this is an every day thing it'll take 5-6 weeks to get out of your system.

If this is the only joint you ever smoked about a week to 10 days.

You can fill in all the in-betweens.
 
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: MrCodeDude
Haha, you're screwed.

Doesn't it stay in your system for over a week?

i hope your right, then i have nothing to worry about
The answer is that it totally depends on the individual; your metabolism, body fat%, how much you smoked, how strong the stuff was you smoked, the position of the moon, etc.. 😉

If you're a lean individual that can eat anything and not gain weight and you smoke lightly, you will probably be clean in less than a week.

If you smoke all day every day and are a bit on the chunky side, it could be as much as 3 weeks - possibly longer, although that would be pretty extreme.

If you smoke all day every day and are very lean, somewhere in between...

That's for urine, of course.

Hair is basically infinate. Once the THC metabolite is in your hair, it does not leave AFAIK.

Of course, the record can only be as long as your hair. If you have long hair, they could potentially find use years in the past ...
 
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
If you smoke dope I hope you fail the drug test and lose out on the greatest job opportunity of your life, dumbass.
Yep, because beer and cigarettes are much less of a bad habit to give into...
 
Originally posted by: MisterMe
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
If you smoke dope I hope you fail the drug test and lose out on the greatest job opportunity of your life, dumbass.
Yep, because beer and cigarettes are much less of a bad habit to give into...

Guess what - they are. If maryjane was legal the sistuation would be completly different -- but as long as it is illegal one simple fact is pot will get you into sisutations like the op is in -- and beer and cigs won't.

Of course, we are all assuming you do all the above responsibly.

And those who think unfiltered or pipes is somehow healthier for you then filtered cigs with reguards to lung health . . . well . . . :roll:

-Chu
 
Originally posted by: Squisher
How much do you/did you smoke?

If this is an every day thing it'll take 5-6 weeks to get out of your system.

If this is the only joint you ever smoked about a week to 10 days.

You can fill in all the in-betweens.


it was one sinlge bowl, about a month ago. hadnt smoked before that for a good 2 months
 
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Squisher
How much do you/did you smoke?

If this is an every day thing it'll take 5-6 weeks to get out of your system.

If this is the only joint you ever smoked about a week to 10 days.

You can fill in all the in-betweens.


it was one sinlge bowl, about a month ago. hadnt smoked before that for a good 2 months


You'll be fine then.
 
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
If you smoke dope I hope you fail the drug test and lose out on the greatest job opportunity of your life, dumbass.
If you drink alcohol, I hope you fail the drug test and lose out on the greatest job opportunity of your life, dumbass.

😛

The only difference between these two statements is that cannabis is unfairly singled out because it is the only drug that has the potential to stay in your system for weeks. Crack, heroin, meth, alcohol.. they're all gone in 24-48 hours. It's a crock of sh!t.

Drug testing is the most blatant invasion of privacy in existance today, and it boggles my mind how we let it become so acceptable.

It is not my employers business what I do on my own time. Period. There should be no questions. If I come to work 5 minutes early, leave 5 minutes late, and do my job 110% of their expectations, it simply does not matter.

This is not the same as comming to work while under the influence. This is unacceptable, and all jobs of course are going to frown on this.
 
Originally posted by: Chu
And those who think unfiltered or pipes is somehow healthier for you then filtered cigs with reguards to lung health . . . well . . . :roll:

-Chu
Well, granted, the human lung wasn't designed to inhale smoke. Also, the burning of any organic matter produces a myriad of chemicals, some of which are quite dangerous. That's kinda a "Duh". 😉

However, you aren't taking one big thing into account - the material being burned. It's apples to oranges. We have no way of knowing exactly how much benzene(for example) is produced with tobacco vs. cannabis, especially when you take into account all the different kinds out there. Tar is another big issue, but I think cannabis resin is much more benign than tobacco resin. I've never heard of even a heavy cannabis user cough up black sh!t, although I'm sure its possible.. but thats just my opinion. To me, it seems that cannabis resin is very light, while tobacco resin more resembles the resin that would come from burning wood - more like creosote... lol

Empiracle evidence shows that cannabis smoke is indeed less dangerous than cigarette smoke. The extent of that would be the individuals call. Sure, you can develop emphysema, chronic bronchitis, etc.. "smokers cough". But.. I challenge you to find one person - in the history of mankind - that has been killed from a disease induced by cannabis smoke inhilation, particularly lung cancer.

Actually, it's quite interesting. There was an article a while back that was saying that scientists may have figured out why cancer never develops in the cannabis smoke-exposed lung. Pre-cancer cells form, but it never turns into cancer.

They were saying that the research could lead to new ways to combat cancer.. heh.

Trying to find it.. I want to read it again myself.
 
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Chu
And those who think unfiltered or pipes is somehow healthier for you then filtered cigs with reguards to lung health . . . well . . . :roll:

-Chu
Well, granted, the human lung wasn't designed to inhale smoke. Also, the burning of any organic matter produces a myriad of chemicals, some of which are quite dangerous. That's kinda a "Duh". 😉

However, you aren't taking one big thing into account - the material being burned. It's apples to oranges. We have no way of knowing exactly how much benzene(for example) is produced with tobacco vs. cannabis, especially when you take into account all the different kinds out there. Tar is another big issue, but I think cannabis resin is much more benign than tobacco resin. I've never heard of even a heavy cannabis user cough up black sh!t, although I'm sure its possible.. but thats just my opinion. To me, it seems that cannabis resin is very light, while tobacco resin more resembles the resin that would come from burning wood - more like creosote... lol

Empiracle evidence shows that cannabis smoke is indeed less dangerous than cigarette smoke. The extent of that would be the individuals call. Sure, you can develop emphysema, chronic bronchitis, etc.. "smokers cough". But.. I challenge you to find one person - in the history of mankind - that has been killed from a disease induced by cannabis smoke inhilation, particularly lung cancer.

Actually, it's quite interesting. There was an article a while back that was saying that scientists may have figured out why cancer never develops in the cannabis smoke-exposed lung. Pre-cancer cells form, but it never turns into cancer.

They were saying that the research could lead to new ways to combat cancer.. heh.

Trying to find it.. I want to read it again myself.

Ok, I'll concede these point -- but what I was really trying to say is that a LOT (maybe the majority, most of the people I know who smoke pot don't agree with the following statement) of pot smokers think that cig smoke is harmful to lung health - while pot smoke is helpful to lung health. As for the effects - good and bad - of THC on the body I really don't know what to believe because the topic is just too highly charged and there are MD's on both sides of the fence.

-Chu

P.S., for the record - I do think either pot should be legal or cigs should be illegal, preferrably the former. I think the way pot was made illegal (DuPoint banning it under the guise of health reasons, when the real reason was to keep hemp out of american textiles markets) is criminal, and so worrying considering all the copyright, privacy, and civil rights bills out there waving the pedophile flag.
 
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: nodoubts2k
Take a vinegar shot


i'd rather fail 😉

Stupid question, is a shot of vinegar just . . . ummm . . . a shot of vinegar? I can't stop drinking good balsamic vinegar streight from the bottle . . . soooo goood . . .

-Chu
 
Back
Top