Here's the article: <a target=new href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,99845,00.html">Is This The End For The SAT?
</a>
I think there's some merit in it. I did't realize that the SATs were developed in the 1920s. Granted they've tried to modify the SATs so that it caters to the times, but I don't think it cuts it. I mean, I did very well on the SATs and all, but I'd rather have known about the history of problems in the Middle East instead of studying about how a cat is to a fish, like a lion is to a deer.
It's going to be tough to develop a good test, but if Bush really wants to put some oomph into our educational system, this is a good place to start. We're probably not even going to get it right the first time, or the second, but I think now is a good time as any time to take a fresh look at how we're going to parcel out our future generation to higher education. We're not going to get it perfect, but let's at least implement a system that's better than the one we have now. And then we'll work from there.
Your thoughts?
</a>
I think there's some merit in it. I did't realize that the SATs were developed in the 1920s. Granted they've tried to modify the SATs so that it caters to the times, but I don't think it cuts it. I mean, I did very well on the SATs and all, but I'd rather have known about the history of problems in the Middle East instead of studying about how a cat is to a fish, like a lion is to a deer.
It's going to be tough to develop a good test, but if Bush really wants to put some oomph into our educational system, this is a good place to start. We're probably not even going to get it right the first time, or the second, but I think now is a good time as any time to take a fresh look at how we're going to parcel out our future generation to higher education. We're not going to get it perfect, but let's at least implement a system that's better than the one we have now. And then we'll work from there.
Your thoughts?