My work laptop is a Dell C400. It's a fairly decent unit, although I wish it was a Pentium M.
I use this often for presnetations, and the 830m video driver pre-installed had some problems switching between primary and secondary display. So I was browsing the Intel support site for updated drivers.
I've used both ATI and nVidia cards in my home (gaming & crap) rigs, and generally follow the "if it ain't broke, don't update the drivers" theory... but I found this to be interesting.
All you nVidiots and fanATIcs don't know how good you have it in the driver department, look at the release notes (number of bugs fixed) in the latest 830m driver release
rev 14.0 - released 1/23/2004
oh, and then
rev 13.6.1 - released 12/31/2003
don't forget about the
rev 13.5.0 - released 10/20/2003
and on and on and on
I used to think frequent driver releases are a good thing, and well, I suppose releasing timely bug fixes is a good thing, but this seems a bit crazy.
I use this often for presnetations, and the 830m video driver pre-installed had some problems switching between primary and secondary display. So I was browsing the Intel support site for updated drivers.
I've used both ATI and nVidia cards in my home (gaming & crap) rigs, and generally follow the "if it ain't broke, don't update the drivers" theory... but I found this to be interesting.
All you nVidiots and fanATIcs don't know how good you have it in the driver department, look at the release notes (number of bugs fixed) in the latest 830m driver release
rev 14.0 - released 1/23/2004
oh, and then
rev 13.6.1 - released 12/31/2003
don't forget about the
rev 13.5.0 - released 10/20/2003
and on and on and on
I used to think frequent driver releases are a good thing, and well, I suppose releasing timely bug fixes is a good thing, but this seems a bit crazy.