Drastic Changes to Formula 1 Racing Proposed

Murpheeee

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,326
0
76
BBC Link


Formula One's ruling body has announced plans to cut costs and improve racing after a meeting with team bosses in London. The FIA have acted after saying the 10 team principals had failed to come up with concrete proposals despite much discussion.

Electronic aids such as traction and launch control are to be eliminated by 2004 at the latest with the FIA moving to have them taken off cars during the coming season.

The governing body has also warned they will "rigorously apply existing rules" in the coming season to ensure teams will not be able to use a spare car in 2003.

Telemetry between the cars and pits as well as all radio communication between the driver and team will also not be allowed.

The FIA also announced plans to introduce standard braking systems, rear wings and other long-life components from 2004.

The prospect of manufacturers being compelled to supply engines to more than one team has also been raised.

From 2005, engines will have to last two races while in 2006 engine life will be extended to six races.

FIA president Max Mosley has warned he is prepared to force through changes if the teams did not agree their own.

"We have gone over to zero tolerance," he said.

"We could have probably been more insistent [last season] so now we decided we would impose the regulations to the letter."

Jordan team owner Eddie Jordan said after the meeting: "It's a huge day as far as we are concerned.

"The atmosphere was the best that I have ever known in a team principals' meeting.

"Things have been changed, Max has been quite brutal about what he wants to see for '03, '04 and '05 in terms of engines."
 

B00ne

Platinum Member
May 21, 2001
2,168
1
0
sounds ok for the sport but bad for what F1 is all about - absolute HighTech and MoneyBurnage
 

Murpheeee

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,326
0
76
I think its a good thing, should make it much more difficult for drivers.

FIA are making an ass of themselves though, changing their minds every year scrambling to make races closer, therefore more exciting, therefore more viewers, therefore more money........

Can't see engine manufacturers being very happy though, having to make an engine that will last 6 races.

As for Traction Control, they made it legal because they couldn't police it, some teams were using it undetected.....so what's gonna change if they ban it again?
 

Murpheeee

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,326
0
76
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
No communication with the team/pits??? How does that help/hurt anything?

amish

I guess it'll be difficult for Ferrari to order Barrichello to pull over if there's no radio ;)
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,801
6,357
126
I think the telemetry info not being transmitted could make a huge difference, the driver will need to be more aware and be forced to make more important decisions such as when to pit. Could be interesting, but then again who knows?
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
sounds ok for the sport but bad for what F1 is all about - absolute HighTech and MoneyBurnage

They do need to reduce costs, because it's getting out of hand. Hell Alain Prost is considering starting a NASCAR team because the $60 million budget he had was not enough to compete in F1 anymore. That's ridiculous when $60 million is chump change.


Also what they need to do to improve the racing is to reduce the dependence on aerodynamic grip that F1 cars have. That's why the racing in F1 has gone downhill. There is little to no side by side racing, very few passes, and barely any close racing. The cars are not able to race close because they depend so heavily on downforce to grip the racing surface that when they get close, downforce is reduced for the following car because the air passes over it, and the car either pushes, or in some situations get loose. Either way, they become hard to manage. Smaller wings, bigger tires. Give the cars back some mechanical grip, and reduce their dependence on aerodynamics and the racing will improve.
 
Nov 17, 2001
171
0
0
I don't see any of these.


These engines are running balls-out for hundreds of miles at a time. They are so powerful that they practically destroy themselves over this time period. Running these for six races in a row just puts the driver in danger. Two seems reasonable, but I really don't mind if the sponsor has enough money to drop 50 grand on a motor per week.

No telemetry between car and pit crew...... A driver needs to talk to his crew. Especially if the driver isn't too hot on car troubles, he's gotta talk to the pit boss so they know what to fix when he pits.

Removing traction control just hurts the situation.

Standard brakes, rear wings, & other components? They're just making this a huge pain in the ass for drivers. If you want to see a group of 200 cars following each other horribly closely, watch Nascar. If you want to see pure racing, check out F1. You don't want horribly close F1 racing since the cars are so fragile..... I think some of these are just really bad regulations. They are horribly unsafe, putting these drivers in even more dangerous conditions than they were already in.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
No communication with the team/pits??? How does that help/hurt anything?

amish

McClaren were able to fix an oil pump over supply issue last season via telemetery, rather than in the pits. I think this should be eliminated as not all teams have sophisicated remote systems to control all aspects of the cars running behavior. Internal engine changes should not be allowed once the car leaves the pits.

 

spwango

Senior member
Mar 7, 2001
419
0
0
They need to bring back grip--Ever since they made the saftey changes following the death of Senna, the racing has sucked--they really need to find a way to keep Ferrari under control, as well--I used to get up at 4:30 AM local time to see the european races--I didn't even bother watching Indy this year...sad, really--
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
I hate crippling regulations...

I think there should just be a weight requirement. Make the cars heavier - but they can have whatever they want in terms of technology.

Hey.. why not have a flying car like in SanFrancisco Rush 2049..

Dammit.. I'm not watching racing until it's as interesting as the video game.