The small claims either refers to individuals or the traditional matters handled in small claims courts, ie anything less than 100 dollars. The price fixing is at worst only going to be half the cost of the items would be my guess.
So if you bought a $20 memory module during the time period that would have cost $10 with out the price fixing you would be entitled to $10 in damages. So you would be considered a small claim.
If you bought say four high end video cards during the time that cost 200 or 300 dollars and half the cost was from the ram, cut the ram cost in half for 50 - 75 dollars a card and with four of them upgrading every year, that is 200 to 300 dollars in damages. That would take you out of the small claims court. Which should take you out of the small claims pool.
The numbers when I looked at it stated that 25% is the attorney's fees some of which are attorney generals for states involved in this. The difference between the 310 and 200, would be 70 mil for fees and 40 mil for expenses and legal fees. They don't expect the cost for the legal fees to come out of the lawyers pockets for some reason. So that suggests that 175 mil is being set aside for larger claims and 25 mil for smaller claims. I would guess this is so that the larger claims don't remove them selves and then use this case as a precedent, to get more money out of them.
I like how this case took 12 years to get to this point. The whole reason the cut off is 2002 is that is when the case was started.
PS I did not create an account on her just to post this, my old account does not seem to exist anymore, so I created a new account any way, this post was just when I noticed my old account does not work anymore.