Judge should ask her for receipts for the past month's expenses.
That doesn't really work when she has unlimited access to burn so much of somebody else's money
Without more info it's hard to say, but there might be entirely valid reasons for his anger/behavior.
She even admitted that he has never hurt her, just "mental trauma" because he yelled/swore at her.
I hate to keep railing on her, but everything she claims sounds like total BS converted to legal speak.
- I knew he was a "thug", I married him anyway, but since he's still a "thug" suddenly that's a "threat".
- He dared try to restrict my insane spending, after I disrespected him he actually yelled at me, scary!
- Since I started attacking him with lawyers, trying to steal even more from him, he said it's "
WAR" scary!
- He even dared to send a family member to pick up personal belongings for him, so extremely threatening!
- He has a history of violence, but I can't cite a single instance, and he tried to have some control in our marriage!
I'm only pulling info from the article posted here. I don't know this guy, maybe he has been proven to be a bad guy.
It's strange that this woman doesn't claim a single case of violence and has no proof of any actual violent actions.
It's all complaints about how mad he has gotten because of her own actions, and how unreasonable she has been.
You get your things and one of his homes, but won't return his stuff there even if a third party came to retrieve them?
Does anybody actually have delusions about why she married him, and what he expected in exchange for the lifestyle?
It's obvious this wasn't a loving relationship, but a legal contract for sex. She got money, he got female companionship.
Based on the claims, it seems she eventually felt entitled to the money and stopped providing the things she agreed to.
It's also possible that she was maintaining status quo, but he was no longer satisfied with the "bang for the buck".
---
Personally I think it's total BS that anybody is entitled to their partners things during a divorce.
The current system is beyond F'd, it's all about crying victim and using lawyers to abuse the law.
You shouldn't be allowed to take what you didn't earn just because you chose to live with them.
You get to take what you brought into the marriage, and anything you can prove you paid for yourself.
If anything was a split expense (like pooling money to pay a mortgage) you get what % you put in.
Seriously, if you suddenly don't like the arrangement or think they "changed" why should you benefit from it?
You should be split up and have everything returned to how it was before the marriage as much as possible.