• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DPAD Speeds

T

Twioz

Senior member
I have had my p3 733 running for about 24+ hours and it only has 8.34k in the result.txt, my Barton 2500 does that much in about an hour, does sound right to everyone? Seems mighty slow.
 
You have to check the number of Mpts in the file.

Its not the size of the file that counts, but the amount of work getting done, which get measured in Mpts ..
 
while that does seem extremely slow:

A) what OS
B) how much ram (dpad is very ram hungry..from 40 --> 200[or so i thought i read]) MB
C)check the results.txt file. Are the 8 or so transfers in there really large ones (i.e. 9.93495%)
D) any other background programs (check to see whether dpad is really going 100% cpu)
 
hehe ... well, check the results.txt file. I once had only 7 results after 2 days and it turned out that all these were 5 times rechecs --> 35 results 😀
 
Ok, It appears that the p3 733 is actually doing 3.2Mpts per minute, this compares to the Barton 2500 that does 12.1 and the p4 2.66 that does 10.3 so I guess it is just about right.
BTW the p3 733 has 512megs of sdram and has nothing running on a fresh install os Windows ME (Monkey Edition).
 
then , yes, i would say it sounds about right 🙂

believe it or not it really does put out a decent amount for what it is. that chip would probably net you 2 WU/day (in seti) while that barton can do 10-12 Wu/day..so that's 1/5 1/6th the output...while in DPAD it does 1/4 the output

🙂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top