Assimilator1
Elite Member
Output by local teams (Mpts) (No other teams are currently close to us in total points and output! 🙂).
TA - 8,186,056 😎 (133 million ahead)
DPC - 873,697
Prod Rank __ Team Rank __ Days Mpts _________ ______ Mpts ___________ Name
_1 _________ _1 _________ 7,199,781 _________ 1,183,622,131 _________ amd.borg
_2 _________ _2 _________ _ 726,252 _________ _ 358,125,716 _________ JonB
_3 _________ _4 _________ __ 76,758 _________ _ 124,354,893 _________ Amaroque
_4 _________ _5 _________ __ 75,316 _________ _ 113,402,837 _________ Silverthorne
_5 _________ 46 _________ __ 59,367 _________ ___ 3,659,884 _________ Chocobo Navy
_6 _________ 13 _________ __ 48,582 _________ __ 23,627,906 _________ caferace
Active members over the past week - 12 (-1 from last stats)
[TA]amd.borg
[TA]JonB
[TA]Amaroque
[TA]Silverthorne
[TA]viztech
[TA]compudog
[TA]Assimilator1
[TA]OrangeKid
[TA]Petrusbroder
[TA]caferace
[TA]Pacemaker
[TA]Chocobo Navy
DPAD stats collected from Free-DC ('yesterday' column).
Official TeAm stats from the DPAD site.
*****************************************************************************************
Another awesome dump by Borgie!:Q😀
I've always wondered how much difference RAM speed, RAM timings & chipset timings would make to DPAD so I've been tweaking my quad rig a bit lately 🙂. I thought a few of you might find it interesting & I also know many here don't go to the DPAD forums so I'll post my results so far as well.
My Q6600 runs on an Asus P5Q Pro mbrd (Intel P45 chipset), until a few days ago it was running at 3.35 GHz, 372 MHz FSB, 745MHz RAM (OCZ DDR2 800 CL4) with 4-4-4-15 timings & tRD 11.
That setup scored an average of 1160.6 Kpts/s (measured using muon1benchmark).
Now I wasn't happy with the RAM being underclocked (due to divider choises & previously no time to tweak), so the 1st tweak I did was to the RAM speed, I bumped it upto 933 MHz with 5-5-5-15 timings, tRD was also automatically reduced to 10. The CAS Latency time for this was 10.75ns, which coincidently was the same as the previous settings so no extra CAS latency penalty 🙂. vRAM had to be boosted from ~1.95v to 2.09v to be stable at this speed.This scored an average of 1213 Kpts/s, which is ~4.5% faster, not a huge improvement but still a worthwhile one 🙂.
After reading an article in a review by Anandtech regarding tRD & it's apparent big gains in memory performance improvement I thought I'd give that a go too.So the next setup was as above except I cut tRD from 10 down to 7.
This scored an average of 1267 Kpts/s, ironically another ~4.5% speed gain 🙂.
My next step is to try a higher FSB with a lower multiplier, so my rig now runs at 3.34 GHz, 417 MHz FSB, 834 MHz RAM with 4-4-4-15 timings & TRD 8 (tRD 7 might be possible but I'll try that latter). However I only just finished stabilty testing that about 1hr ago so I don't have results yet. I'll give an update tomorrow with the new figures.
Hopefully a combination of a higher FSB, 1:1 RAM/FSB ratio & lower CAS time of 9.58ns will give quite an improvement (although the lower(?) memory bandwidth may counter that a bit), time will tell!........
[update] Well this sucks!, despite much higher FSB & lower RAM latencies it only scores 1258.4 Kpts/s, worse than the 372:933 setting. Oh well on the plus side dropping the FSB down means I can set the NBv back to def.
Although I now have some DDR2 1066 RAM to play with 😀, I wonder which FSB will be quicker then? maybe the one with the highest RAM speed??
Best I could get my RAM stable at on a 372 MHz FSB was 991 MHz DDR, 5-5-5-15 timings, tRD7. Average score over a 21.2 hr run was 1278.1 Kpts/s, slightly higher at ~1% faster than the previous best 😛.[update] Retested & I got 1256.4 Kpts/s, wth??😕
Currently stability testing 417 MHz FSB, Q6600 @3.34 GHz, 1046 MHz RAM, 5-5-5-18, tRD 8.
Eventually got it to pass OCCT for 24hrs+.
Bizarely this setup only scored 1273.3 Kpt/s ..... that doesn't make any sense 😕 (score updated from more results, pushed score up 8).[update] makes sense now the other score has dropped!
TA - 8,186,056 😎 (133 million ahead)
DPC - 873,697
Prod Rank __ Team Rank __ Days Mpts _________ ______ Mpts ___________ Name
_1 _________ _1 _________ 7,199,781 _________ 1,183,622,131 _________ amd.borg
_2 _________ _2 _________ _ 726,252 _________ _ 358,125,716 _________ JonB
_3 _________ _4 _________ __ 76,758 _________ _ 124,354,893 _________ Amaroque
_4 _________ _5 _________ __ 75,316 _________ _ 113,402,837 _________ Silverthorne
_5 _________ 46 _________ __ 59,367 _________ ___ 3,659,884 _________ Chocobo Navy
_6 _________ 13 _________ __ 48,582 _________ __ 23,627,906 _________ caferace
Active members over the past week - 12 (-1 from last stats)
[TA]amd.borg
[TA]JonB
[TA]Amaroque
[TA]Silverthorne
[TA]viztech
[TA]compudog
[TA]Assimilator1
[TA]OrangeKid
[TA]Petrusbroder
[TA]caferace
[TA]Pacemaker
[TA]Chocobo Navy
DPAD stats collected from Free-DC ('yesterday' column).
Official TeAm stats from the DPAD site.
*****************************************************************************************
Another awesome dump by Borgie!:Q😀
I've always wondered how much difference RAM speed, RAM timings & chipset timings would make to DPAD so I've been tweaking my quad rig a bit lately 🙂. I thought a few of you might find it interesting & I also know many here don't go to the DPAD forums so I'll post my results so far as well.
My Q6600 runs on an Asus P5Q Pro mbrd (Intel P45 chipset), until a few days ago it was running at 3.35 GHz, 372 MHz FSB, 745MHz RAM (OCZ DDR2 800 CL4) with 4-4-4-15 timings & tRD 11.
That setup scored an average of 1160.6 Kpts/s (measured using muon1benchmark).
Now I wasn't happy with the RAM being underclocked (due to divider choises & previously no time to tweak), so the 1st tweak I did was to the RAM speed, I bumped it upto 933 MHz with 5-5-5-15 timings, tRD was also automatically reduced to 10. The CAS Latency time for this was 10.75ns, which coincidently was the same as the previous settings so no extra CAS latency penalty 🙂. vRAM had to be boosted from ~1.95v to 2.09v to be stable at this speed.This scored an average of 1213 Kpts/s, which is ~4.5% faster, not a huge improvement but still a worthwhile one 🙂.
After reading an article in a review by Anandtech regarding tRD & it's apparent big gains in memory performance improvement I thought I'd give that a go too.So the next setup was as above except I cut tRD from 10 down to 7.
This scored an average of 1267 Kpts/s, ironically another ~4.5% speed gain 🙂.
My next step is to try a higher FSB with a lower multiplier, so my rig now runs at 3.34 GHz, 417 MHz FSB, 834 MHz RAM with 4-4-4-15 timings & TRD 8 (tRD 7 might be possible but I'll try that latter). However I only just finished stabilty testing that about 1hr ago so I don't have results yet. I'll give an update tomorrow with the new figures.
Hopefully a combination of a higher FSB, 1:1 RAM/FSB ratio & lower CAS time of 9.58ns will give quite an improvement (although the lower(?) memory bandwidth may counter that a bit), time will tell!........
[update] Well this sucks!, despite much higher FSB & lower RAM latencies it only scores 1258.4 Kpts/s, worse than the 372:933 setting. Oh well on the plus side dropping the FSB down means I can set the NBv back to def.
Although I now have some DDR2 1066 RAM to play with 😀, I wonder which FSB will be quicker then? maybe the one with the highest RAM speed??
Best I could get my RAM stable at on a 372 MHz FSB was 991 MHz DDR, 5-5-5-15 timings, tRD7. Average score over a 21.2 hr run was 1278.1 Kpts/s, slightly higher at ~1% faster than the previous best 😛.[update] Retested & I got 1256.4 Kpts/s, wth??😕
Currently stability testing 417 MHz FSB, Q6600 @3.34 GHz, 1046 MHz RAM, 5-5-5-18, tRD 8.
Eventually got it to pass OCCT for 24hrs+.
Bizarely this setup only scored 1273.3 Kpt/s ..... that doesn't make any sense 😕 (score updated from more results, pushed score up 8).[update] makes sense now the other score has dropped!