The idea is to make it as CPU dependant as possibleOriginally posted by: Mik3y
the benchies suck though. only 640x480 res @ low quality? i wonder how well it does at 1024x768 @ high quality.
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The idea is to make it as CPU dependant as possibleUnless it is 64bit though AMD is still going to have the edge
![]()
There may already be an AMD 64bit microprocessor that can do it@that speed.? Price is enough to cause :heart: failure though, even if it can pull it off.Originally posted by: AWhackWhiteBoy
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The idea is to make it as CPU dependant as possibleUnless it is 64bit though AMD is still going to have the edge
![]()
Still though, 1.7ghz, under 60C, passively cooled with a dinky copper cooler. I'd like to see a 64bit AMD do that. Speed isn't everything![]()
All this makes it easy to see why they repaved the roadmap.Originally posted by: Stormgiant
@xtremesystems
3213Mhz run - 25s
Originally posted by: Concillian
Pentium M on desktop could be the Silver Bullet for Intel + Enthusiasts.
People have been chomping at the bit to see real Pentium M performance (with high end memory, etc...) and it looks like it's not far off.
Competition is good!
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
The idea is to make it as CPU dependant as possibleOriginally posted by: Mik3y
the benchies suck though. only 640x480 res @ low quality? i wonder how well it does at 1024x768 @ high quality.Unless it is 64bit though AMD is still going to have the edge
![]()
Yup !Originally posted by: Zebo
Not really that ineresting comparing a highly OVERCLOCKED M to a non OCed A64
Throw a OCed 939 A64@2.7 in there, at $215 BTW, and watch the ass whipping commence.
And where's my 64 bitness?
Originally posted by: CraigRT
competition is good! but this will only help AMD in the long run! :evil: