The author did mention Ferguson near the end of the article.
But this is exactly the issue I wrote out in one of the other threads. So much was made of Ferguson that to most people it drowned out the other, legitimate stories out there.
Yep, he made it plain that Brown is part of his victim list, but you make a valid point. None of these people were singled out randomly or because of their skin color (although they may well get less latitude because of it) but that alone doesn't make what happened to them automatically acceptable. The anti-cop side insists on lumping them all together as victims; for us to lump them all together as non-victims is just as foolish, yet I indirectly did exactly that.
Still, my point was this: All the people we've been discussing did something non-random to start the confrontation. Even though the validity of the response varies (in my opinion) from reasonable to criminal, they were not selected randomly, nor were they selected just for being black. It's not as though I'm going to suddenly start pointing a pellet gun at people against my will, or find myself mysteriously having robbed a store, or punching a cop, or belligerently resisting arrest, because I know you can be totally right and still end up dead unless you handle yourself very calmly and peacefully. The concept that "this can happen to anybody" is simply wrong.
The no-knock warrant deaths can though, because sometimes they get the wrong house and see your TV remote as that heinous parking violator's Thompson.