• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Don't donate-> They'll sell your name to spam lists

JEDI

Lifer
[/i]Text

Charities are killing themselves off
by M.F. Tones
Late last year, my accountant told me I had to lower my net income by about a thousand dollars. He was pretty specific as to how I should do this as well: give $500.00 to the charities of my choice, and spend $500.00 joining professional organizations that I could deduct as a necessary expense at work.
Among the lucky recipients were the ACLU, Amnesty International, a couple of animal rescue organizations, local museums, and a pair of hospices.

Never again will I donate another DIME to a charity.

Within days of sending off the various checks, I began to be innundated with even more requests for money. And not just from groups that they [obviously] sold my name to (dozens of groups I had never heard of before suddenly decided I should get 5 or so requests for donations per month).

What really burned my ass was that the groups I had sent money to were plastering my [postal] mailbox with requests for more money, and doing it at a rate that must have cost them at least as much as I originally donated. So I have given them very hard earned money to help their respective causes, and they in turn have spent it asking me to repeat my previous largess - in spades no less. Places that got $20.00 from me were now asking for $50.00 and $100.00; places that had received over $50.00 were asking for sums as high as $500.00!

Why should I continue down this path? The answer is I shouldn't, and neither should you. A charity that needs the money should use their donations for their stated purpose, and NOT to send out more requests for money so they can pay their "executives" outrageous salaries.

This christmas, I am donating not a thing to anyone. And come next January, I am going to gladly pay the extra dollars to the government - sure, they'll waste the money just as sure as the charities did, but at least they won't rub my nose in it with dozens of mailings a month...

 
That's why I give to local charities that don't want your mailing address such as soup kitchens and hospitals 🙂
 
It's not a word I throw around carelessly, but the author of that piece is a moron.

I would bet that this is a person who has never given to charity in his life before, and has no clue how it works. Does he think charities survive on one-time $50 gifts from people? Most people give to a charity because they believe in the work it's doing and have no problem with providing ongoing support. They can't sit around and wait for people to think about sending in another $20 or $50. Any one of those charities would have taken him off their mailing lists with a simple phone call or letter.

It might cost a charity 50-75 cents to send out a solicitation. They have a pretty good idea how much it will bring in and if was a losing proposition they would quit. I don't send in a donation every time I get a letter, but I like to hear what the organization is up to anyway.

The guy obviously had no interest in the specific organizations and only gave money for tax reasons. Now he's steamed that they stayed in touch. He has no clue that most people make ongoing contributions, and that's why they send him additional letters. His comment about "executive salaries" makes no sense at all. Were their salaries a lot lower before he sent in his donations? Why is he only upset about their pay structure now?

I'm so touched by his selfless generosity.
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: kranky
It's not a word I throw around carelessly, but the author of that piece is a moron.

I would bet that this is a person who has never given to charity in his life before, and has no clue how it works. Does he think charities survive on one-time $50 gifts from people? Most people give to a charity because they believe in the work it's doing and have no problem with providing ongoing support. They can't sit around and wait for people to think about sending in another $20 or $50. Any one of those charities would have taken him off their mailing lists with a simple phone call or letter.

It might cost a charity 50-75 cents to send out a solicitation. They have a pretty good idea how much it will bring in and if was a losing proposition they would quit. I don't send in a donation every time I get a letter, but I like to hear what the organization is up to anyway.

The guy obviously had no interest in the specific organizations and only gave money for tax reasons. Now he's steamed that they stayed in touch. He has no clue that most people make ongoing contributions, and that's why they send him additional letters. His comment about "executive salaries" makes no sense at all. Were their salaries a lot lower before he sent in his donations? Why is he only upset about their pay structure now?

I'm so touched by his selfless generosity.
rolleye.gif


ditto

 
Back
Top