I did misjudge the number of stupid people that would chime in on this topic, so thanks for pointing that out. There were only a couple of you, but stupid goes a long way. Most everyone was helpful and I do appreciate their responses. I edited my OP down to hopefully discourage any more irrelevant responses. The next time I'm curious about tires I'll find a dedicated car forum. This is how a similar topic goes when grownups are involved. Notice how productive and mature this conversation is compared to ATG?
http://forums.nicoclub.com/are-winrun-tires-any-good-t549677.html
I did misjudge the number of stupid people that would chime in on this topic, so thanks for pointing that out. There were only a couple of you, but stupid goes a long way. Most everyone was helpful and I do appreciate their responses. I edited my OP down to hopefully discourage any more irrelevant responses. The next time I'm curious about tires I'll find a dedicated car forum. This is how a similar topic goes when grownups are involved. Notice how productive and mature this conversation is compared to ATG?
http://forums.nicoclub.com/are-winrun-tires-any-good-t549677.html
Um, that thread basically seems to offer the same responses: no, those tires are not a good decision.
A few seem to offer that they are 'good for the money,' but given their cost, that is essentially a vote for 'they didn't come apart while driving.'
You drive a car that was, what, 28-30k+ new? You put 20" wheels on it?
You're a joke if you put Nankang, Nexen, or the like on that car. Even worse if you go for the total unknowns below those brands.
Be offended all you want. Doesn't change how illogical you're being. I don't think you ever did reply to my questioning Re: 'why is it a problem to spend 2x the money on a much better tire that will last twice as long?'
duh duh duh
Um, that thread basically seems to offer the same responses: no, those tires are not a good decision.
I don't think you ever did reply to my questioning Re: 'why is it a problem to spend 2x the money on a much better tire that will last twice as long?'
Um, that thread basically seems to offer the same responses: no, those tires are not a good decision.
A few seem to offer that they are 'good for the money,' but given their cost, that is essentially a vote for 'they didn't come apart while driving.'
You drive a car that was, what, 28-30k+ new? You put 20" wheels on it?
You're a joke if you put Nankang, Nexen, or the like on that car. Even worse if you go for the total unknowns below those brands.
Be offended all you want. Doesn't change how illogical you're being. I don't think you ever did reply to my questioning Re: 'why is it a problem to spend 2x the money on a much better tire that will last twice as long?'
