• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Does this sentence make sense?

D

DotheDamnTHing

Platinum Member
The impetus for the creation and continuation of the Nazi regime and its resultant horrible excesses have been debated over as the result of an interrupted path to modern development by World War One, German Herrenmensch culture and the varying claims between intentionalists and structionalists (Kershaw, 239-40).


THanks
 
I personally don't possess an adequate terminology to understand the sentense but the structure seems fine.
 
Also, I think it should say "has", not "have", since it is referring to the word "impetus"

Impetus has, not impetus have.

They mistakenly used the word "have" because the preceeding word was "excesses". However, the word "has" is being applied to the word "impetus", not the word "excesses".


The correct sentence would read:

"The impetus for the creation and continuation of the Nazi regime and its resultant horrible excesses has been debated as the result of an interrupted path to modern development by World War One, German Herrenmensch culture and the varying claims between intentionalists and structionalists (Kershaw, 239-40)."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top