• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Does the Q8400 support VT?

Originally posted by: armstrda
Yep

http://ark.intel.com/cpu.aspx?groupId=38512
Click to expand...

Strange, it supports VT, but not TXT. I thought those two often went together.

Intel really needs to get their act together, and stop crippling processors.

ALL 45nm Core2-family (including "Pentium Dual Core") chips should support SSE4.1, VT, and TXT. Only then will those features reach widespread adoption. Right now, Intel is undercutting support by not making those features ubiquitous, so software developers are remiss about implementing them.
 
What is this cpu anyway? Two E5200 slapped together?
I really hate the latest "mid range" quad cores, that Intel threw on the market lately. They took more then half the cache from the high end models, slapped the smallest multiplier possible onto them and sells them at not such attractive prices.

Just when the Q6600-q6700 where starting to drop in price, they were phased out and replaced with these bollocks : Q8200, q9300 and now this q8400.
I guess this is just the side effect of AMD still being unable to compete on all sides with Intel.
 
Originally posted by: error8
I guess this is just the side effect of AMD still being unable to compete on all sides with Intel.
Click to expand...

What exactly does AMD have to do with Intel pushing products with incomplete feature sets? I think you would be better off saying "I guess this is just the side effect of Intel not being able to compete with AMD for feature-complete parts at all price-points."
 
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Originally posted by: error8
I guess this is just the side effect of AMD still being unable to compete on all sides with Intel.
Click to expand...

"I guess this is just the side effect of Intel not being able to compete with AMD for feature-complete parts at all price-points."
Click to expand...

Well yeah, this sounds better. 😉
 
Go to 'About' tab in cpuz and click/save "Registers Dump" It'll give you a .txt file with more detailed cpuid info.
 
Originally posted by: lopri
Go to 'About' tab in cpuz and click/save "Registers Dump" It'll give you a .txt file with more detailed cpuid info.
Click to expand...

Processors Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Processor 1 (ID = 0)
Number of cores 4 (max 4)
Number of threads 4 (max 4)
Name Intel Core 2 Quad
Codename Yorkfield
Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz
Package Socket 775 LGA (platform ID = 4h)
CPUID 6.7.A
Extended CPUID 6.17
Core Stepping R0
Technology 45 nm
Core Speed 1999.7 MHz (6.0 x 333.3 MHz)
Rated Bus speed 1333.1 MHz
Stock frequency 2666 MHz
Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, EM64T
L1 Data cache 4 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache 4 x 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache 2 x 2048 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
FID/VID Control yes
FID range 6.0x - 8.0x
max VID 1.288 V
Features XD, VT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top