Usually free phones require an address, one per, 250 minutes a month
Yeah, I mean, superheroes need a place to change into costume.
Not by any definition of discriminate that I know. I doubt there is any anti-homeless motive behind it. It's just a symptom of the evolution of telephone service.
A better question would be "Does the lack of payphones have a disproportionately negative effect on the homeless relative to the rest of society"?
There are call boxes on CA freeways, but I think those only connect to emergency numbers.
No, welfare everywhere pays for it under "wraparound services" just like rent, utilities, car, and food.
Yep. Free everything. Why the hell am I working again?
Free - rent, utilities, money, cars, cell phones, etc.
Why the hell am I working? Look to the riots in London, take away the free shit and they riot.
Definitely discriminates against drug dealers and hostage takers. And anyone who needs to take a drunken piss on a Friday night.
Yep. Free everything. Why the hell am I working again?
Free - rent, utilities, money, cars, cell phones, etc.
Why the hell am I working? Look to the riots in London, take away the free shit and they riot.
Definitely discriminates against drug dealers and hostage takers. And anyone who needs to take a drunken piss on a Friday night.
How are they supposed to communicate? They don't have any place to plug in a cell phone to charge it.
I am a bit disheartened to see so many pay phones going away. I know that if I am ever stranded somewhere, and my cell phone runs out of juice, I'll be screwed.
Most homeless people have small apartments and access to shelters.
I used to hate it when I needed to make a call (it was .10 back then) and all I had was a quarter. Bastards.
The places that still have phones (in bad neighborhoods) usually have signs posted above them saying that the phones are monitored by law enforcement. Saw a few when I was living in Berkeley.
Cell phones killed pay phones for sure, much too expensive to build/maintain/service.
