Originally posted by: Vee
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
So I don't understand why you voted no. IMHO.
Because I strongly suspected the OP to be using a generalization in order to "prove" a correct point "wrong".
I'm using a generalization to prove that generally you need software to coinside with hardware. One of my answers was not "has everything to do with" but was "has very much to do with" meaning that there are probably some instances where it doesn't but generally it does.
If someone else other than anger-raged, word fumbling beggerking wants to explain those rare situations to me maybe I'll understand his points better. Sometimes his posts are so fragmented and poorly written that I think I just have some trouble understanding what he means. I'm all for discussing this peacefully and logically instead of arguing with beggerking about what is a correct techinical term and what is a name. (Yes, he did try to argue that too).
Is there any case of software being able to work correctly without hardware? Is there any instance where hardware can function without any software? I don't know of such situations but if someone else does, please enlighten me.