- Jul 13, 2005
- 33,986
- 3,321
- 126
wOWZA-- just as i had always thought...
Just amazing!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110509...lYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDZG9lc3BvbGxpbmRp
COMMENTARY | Sometimes polls tend to look like they indicate one thing when they really are only offering a broad view of a more intricate question, problem, argument or premise. Take, for instance, the recent Gallup poll that revealed that those Republicans with college degrees are more likely to vote for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney than any of the other potential 2012 GOP candidates. That same poll shows that of the respondents, only 9 percent who have college degrees support former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Does that indicate that those more inclined to support Palin are just a bunch of ill-educated, stupid Republicans?
Although the argument might be made that there exists a segment of Palin followers that are not only ill-educated and ignorant but also misguided and ill-informed. At the same time, that argument can be used against any candidates followers, whether they be Republican, Democrat or independent. But that argument does not accurately reflect what the lower numbers of college educated supporters/respondents in the poll actually indicates.
What the 9 percent truly indicates is that of 100 percent of those Republicans polled in the survey that have college degrees, only 9 percent of that number intend to support Palin as a candidate for president. At the same time, of 100 percent of Republicans polled that do not have a college degree, 16 percent assert they back the former Alaska governor. This does not in any way indicate that people of lower intelligence levels are supportive of Palin, just that there is a greater number of people who do not have a college education that back her candidacy as opposed to those who do have a college degree........there is more....
Just amazing!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110509...lYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDZG9lc3BvbGxpbmRp
COMMENTARY | Sometimes polls tend to look like they indicate one thing when they really are only offering a broad view of a more intricate question, problem, argument or premise. Take, for instance, the recent Gallup poll that revealed that those Republicans with college degrees are more likely to vote for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney than any of the other potential 2012 GOP candidates. That same poll shows that of the respondents, only 9 percent who have college degrees support former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Does that indicate that those more inclined to support Palin are just a bunch of ill-educated, stupid Republicans?
Although the argument might be made that there exists a segment of Palin followers that are not only ill-educated and ignorant but also misguided and ill-informed. At the same time, that argument can be used against any candidates followers, whether they be Republican, Democrat or independent. But that argument does not accurately reflect what the lower numbers of college educated supporters/respondents in the poll actually indicates.
What the 9 percent truly indicates is that of 100 percent of those Republicans polled in the survey that have college degrees, only 9 percent of that number intend to support Palin as a candidate for president. At the same time, of 100 percent of Republicans polled that do not have a college degree, 16 percent assert they back the former Alaska governor. This does not in any way indicate that people of lower intelligence levels are supportive of Palin, just that there is a greater number of people who do not have a college education that back her candidacy as opposed to those who do have a college degree........there is more....
